Use a good range of graphs and diagrams, case studies (i.e Nigeria, US?), divide references into primary and secondary references, include a table of abbreviations, table of contents.Keep in mind, what is the question? why is it important? how will you address it (qualitative or quantitative approach?), an appendix may be good.A-range: Excellent grasp of concept, clear evidence of deep learning. Excellentanalytical ability and critical thought. Superior understanding and appreciation of thesubject. Superior ability in logical argument. High proficiency in structuring andpresenting arguments. Excellent use of examples, references, citations to support pointsand justify arguments. Evidence of extensive reading and very good informationretrieval skillsWhen writing, it may be useful to bear tin mind?i.What is the research question that you are trying to answer? Have theresearch question as the title of your paper. Thelps provide focus.ii. What does the scholarly literature say? Provide a few sentences (e.g.three to five) summarizing the key messages of each of your four orfive main references. Ensure that your references are of high quality.Provide complete citations. The proposal has to contain a criticalreview of the relevant scholarly articles. In short, you nto readseveral scholarly articles, select the relevant ones, and provide concisesummaries in the proposal. It is not enough merely to list the scholarlyarticles, or simply to say that they exist.iii. What is the specific methodology that you plan to use? Explain threeor four alternative methodologies, select one, and provide strongreasons why it was selected. If you plan to use numerical methods,provide the specific equations that you plan to use, and discuss yourapproach to the calculations. A good literature review should assistyour methodology selection, whether quantitative or qualitative. Whatare the methodologies that other scholarly articles have used? How didtheir methodologies assist in answering their research questions? Howdifferent or similar is your research question to theirs? How differentor similar is your methodology to theirs? As you go through thescholarly literature, you should be able to find the variousmethodologies that have been used, and select the one that is relevantto your work.iv. What is the hypothesis that you seek to test? Show how the acceptanceor rejection of your hypothesis conforms to your methodology andserves to answer your research question. If you plan to use aquantitative approach, provide a strategy for estimation or modelling.If you plan to use a qualitative approach, provide a strategy for testingthe validity of a claim or set of propositions.v. What are the data or information needed? Explain the strategy foracquiring, handling, and processing the data or information in amanner that is appropriate to your selected methodology.vi. What are the findings that you expect? Describe the range of resultsthat are reasonable. Provide a strategy for dealing with results thatlook unreasonable or anomalous. What is the range of expected orreasonable results? How near or far are your results relative to it? Arethere clues provided by other scholarly articles as regards possiblereasons for being outside it? How adequate are your conceptual ortheoretical foundations? Are there violations of fundamentalassumptions of economic or statistical theory? Are there severe marketdistortions that are potentially confounding the theory or empiricalimplementation? Are there alternative model specifications that couldbe used? How would you procto adjust your model, if needed? Howavailable or complete is your data? Would a longer or shorter timeseries alter the results significantly? How stable are the parametersacross regimes within the sample period? How stable are theparameters if the sample is changed? Have you executed a properimplementation? Have you conducted sanity checks on the softwarecode, database, etc.? It is crucial to be able to demonstrate an ability toengage in reflection on (rather than a mechanical acceptance of) theresults. Are there other scholarly articles that report unexpectedresults? How do they structure their explanations or solutions?vii. How do you think the findings will be useful to decision makers? Shareyour insights ideally stemming from deep learning, reflection, andintellectual maturity. Exercise your skills in the use of history, theory,and statistics, as needed. Draw conclusions or make recommendationson the basis of your analysis. They should emerge organically andnaturally from the analysis and research process (rather thanarbitrarily invoked or somehow arising randomly without analyticalsupport).viii. What are the risks to the timely completion of the paper? There couldbe a variety of risks (e.g. inadequate conceptual foundation,unavailable or incomplete data, improper implementation, unexpectedresults, errors, etc.). Explain how you plan to mitigate them. Think ofworse case scenarios and how you intend to cope with them.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]