In the second part, I ask that you pay attention to the tension/dissonance in the work (it’s there) and to evaluate which literary elements contribute to produce the tension (imagery, metaphor, language, character, style, setting, symbolism).
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Emerging Information Communication Technologies (ICT)” and their are specific items that need to be specified, and i dont know what you guys mean by the number of pages… but all i do know is that i need a slide show presentation that will last for 5-7 minutes. i will also send you an attachment of the marking criteria and the subject and how it should be discussed.
2. In the context of IT, you are to research the topic of “Emerging Information Communication Technologies (ICT)”. There are many new tools and devices emerging in the communication area. These tools and devices have opened up the world of knowledge sharing. Your research should focus on your allocated area (a, b, or c) and research two different tools or devices of Emerging ICT used by each, including the educational uses and benefits of each.
and my focus should be about – Social Media (2 different tools or devices)
i. Introduce your topic and focus area by defining and explaining to the audience an overview of your presentation.
ii. Individually for each of the 2 types in your focus area, develop a discussion, giving examples and explaining the educational uses and benefits of the two (2) different tools or devices used.
iii. Conclude your presentation. This is a summary of your key concepts and the main ideas of your presentation. Do not introduce any new material in the conclusion.
and the sources must be from 2010 and above please. and can you please only speak about devices and not tools.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]In the first part, articulate a coherent response. Be specific. What specific element(s) of the work triggered your response? Wording? Images? Characters? Keep in mind that these works evoke varied and contradictory feelings. The goal of this part of the assignment is for you to develop the ability to express a sophisticated aesthetic response. Please tune into the emotional impact of the work. Writing is meant to touch us emotionally; an A response will articulate a complex emotional response AND what elements of the work triggered that response.
In the second part, I ask that you pay attention to the tension/dissonance in the work (it’s there) and to evaluate which literary elements contribute to produce the tension (imagery, metaphor, language, character, style, setting, symbolism).
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The essay should be no more than 4500 words (including references, excluding bibliography)
Minimum of 10 sources should be used, and when possible/relevant, mention of primary sources should be made.
The introduction should have a clear thesis statement and brief explanation of how the essay will be structured/presented (for example: “This paper will first discuss …, Secondly, it will analyse… and finally it will describe….”)
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Social Interaction, Groups and Organizations
Identify 1 primary group and 1 formal organization to which you belong. Then analyze these 2 groups and your place in them in a well-crafted report that includes the following paragraphs:
Name the primary group you picked, and provide specific examples of how it reflects the attributes of a primary group.
Name the formal organization you chose, and provide specific examples of how it reflects the attributes of a secondary group. Identify which type of formal organization it is (utilitarian, normative, coercive), and explain why it fits that type.
Provide specific examples of how the characteristics of bureaucracy and McDonaldization are evident in the formal organization you identified.
Identify the statuses you hold in your primary group and in the formal organization. Indicate whether they are achieved or ascribed statuses. Describe the roles that are attached to these statuses, and provide specific examples of how you experience both role strain and role conflict.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Project II: Rhetorical Analysis Written Assignment
Rhetorical Analysis Education
Rhetorical analysis (3 pages)
In your second major assignment for the semester, you will analyze a public document or public documents related to the topic of illiteracy. You’ll be focusing in particular on the text. You will analyze the “rhetorical” choices the author (or authoring agency) is making in the source, exploring why the author(s) chose the specific words and images in the source, why they chose its color scheme, why they chose a particular mode of distribution (pamphlet, website, flyer etc.), what information they make, through arrangement, most visible, what emotional appeals they make on their audience, etc. You will support a theme or thesis about the text’s choices with details from the text itself.
Outcomes for Rhetorical Analysis
• Identify how the purpose of text is achieved through the choices a writer makes
• Evaluate the degree to which the argumentative choices a writer makes are effective and ethical
• Determine the effects of point of view on an author’s interpretation/argument
• Organize prose giving priority to more important ideas
• Demonstrate effective logical reasoning in written prose
• Incorporate paraphrases and quotations smoothly and honestly into writing
Some pointers and questions to keep in mind:
• Read and annotate any written text in the document.
• Closely examine visual elements (images, colors, layout, fonts, etc.).
• Determine the document’s purpose (implicit or explicit). Is it making an argument? Trying to persuade someone of something? Trying to sell something? Simply informing its audience on a topic?
• Determine the audience. Who does the document target? How can you tell?
• Who is the author or producer? Why might it matter? Is any bias present or possible? Is the author/producer knowledgeable and reliable?
• How current is the document and its information? When was it published (or last updated/ revised)?
• How complete and accurate is the information? Is anything missing?
• Examine the tone, purpose, organization/structure, point of view, and context of the document’s text. What do these choices add?
• Examine the text’s appeals to emotion, logic, and credibility.
• Evaluate any claims made in the document. Are they fair? Is there any faulty reasoning in these claims?
• How are images, design, links, and other media incorporated? Are they appropriate? Do they match what the text communicates, or do they contradict it?
• What features of design (color scheme, variations of font style and size, placement on the page or screen, formal or playful lettering) seem to stand out? Do the design elements add to the function/ purpose of the document, or are they merely decorative?
• What is the overall message of the document? What does it attempt to do? Is it successful?
More thoughts about specific elements
1. The words
HINT: The written text will be the most important part of the document to analyze
• How much written text is present? To what effect?
• What do the words say? Do they agree with the image or contradict it in some way?
• What kind of diction, tone, language is present in the written text?
• What do the words imply? What do they add to the message of the document?
2. Images
• What kind of images are present? Photographs? Cartoons/ drawings? A combination?
• What’s the image of? Is there a story being told? What and why?
• If people are present, how large is/are the body/ies? What part of the body is dominant in the picture? Is the figure shown interacting with others, or alone? What kind facial expression is present? What emotion does the facial expression suggest? What is the subject wearing? What does the subject’s clothing imply about him/her?
3. How is the document organized?
• Is the image more important than the words, or vice versa? In what proportion do words and images appear? Where are the words in relation to the image(s)?
• Is there one central image, one section where your eye goes first? Are there other surrounding images/background or just one?
• Does the document employ different levels of clarity/ focus? Are there parts that are blurred or less noticeable?
• What kinds of links are present (if it’s a website)? Do they link inward or outward or both? Are the links thorough, or are certain things missing? Do they raise any questions?
• What does this organization contribute to the meaning/purpose of the document?
Remember to include if and how the author uses Logos, Pathos, and Ethos.
STRATEGIES: What strategies does the author use to achieve the purpose? Logos? Pathos? Ethos? How does he/she try to persuade the audience that his/her argument is valid?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The student will be prepared to discuss a specific proposed criminal statute, preferably one recently the subject of media attention. Examples of such media attention might involve the proposed law regarding cell phone use in cars, proposed laws prohibiting gay marriage, legalizing marijuana, etc.
Our Texas legislature is in session for Spring 2013. Each student should “adopt” a criminal law bill, either in support or opposition, and follow the bill through the semester. You are to be the resident expert regarding the bill, its origins, its status, and its intended effect. You will write a one page typewritten double-spaced on this bill, or one that you believe should have been filed.
Any statute or bill discussed should certainly be criminal in nature, and the student should be able to attribute to the sponsor of the bill or the bill number. The assignment does not require that the student limit discussion to Texas laws, so feel free to discuss the laws of other jurisdictions.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Melissa Mulders is a qualified chemical engineer who graduated from the Farbridge
University two years ago. Melissa works for East Island Petrochemical Company. Since
graduation she has been developing a research career and plans to return to university next
year to undertake fulltime Doctor of Philosophy studies. Currently she works in the Research
and Development Division of East Island Petrochemicals. The Research and Development
Division has about 15 staff, including 5 industrial chemists, 3 chemical engineers and 4
? University of Southern Queensland
18 ENG3003 ? Engineering management
technicians. The Division has about 40 research projects underway, mainly looking at either the use of etrochemical products in applications outside their traditional uses, or the use of additives in petroleum fuels. Most of the research is cutting edge technology and is highly
confidential because of its commercial value. Melissa, along with all other staff, had to sign a Confidentiality Agreement when she first joined the Division. Annual ?Intellectual Property
Protection? seminars are held for all staff, and at these events the need for strict secrecy in the work is always emphasised.
The Head of the Division is Walpole Snodgrass, a 44 year old divorcee. Walpole is a known
womaniser and has come very close on several occasions to landing himself in trouble with
sexual harassment charges. However, Walpole is also a very astute business operator when it
comes to recruiting funds for his Division. He knows most of the senior managers in East
Island Petrochemicals very well, and is also friendly with several of the directors of the
company. He is an expert at extracting funds from senior management, and if he is unable to
secure funds for a project in the normal way he is not averse to personally lobbying
individual directors to support his case. Melissa does not have a lot to do with Walpole, for
which she is thankful. The few occasions where she has had to discuss issues with him she
has found him to be lecherous and he tried to grope her on one occasion when they were
alone together.
Melissa?s immediate supervisor is Brian Bunsen, an industrial chemist. Brian is in his early
50?s and has been with the company all his working life. He is fairly apathetic towards his
job, and tends to do the minimum to keep the bosses happy. He feels the company has
overlooked his talents and was particularly upset when Walpole was appointed Head of the
Division five years ago. Walpole was brought in from another section of the company and
Brian, as the most senior research scientist in the Division at that time, had expected to be
named as Head. Brian now reports directly to Walpole and their relationship is often stormy.
Apart from Melissa, the other people in Brian?s section are Roger ?The Revhead? Robinson,
Craig Cattler and Trudy Truesome. Roger is a chemical engineer who graduated from
university 8 years ago. He is known as ?The Revhead? because of his obsession with car drag
racing. Roger has his own dragster which he races in drag meetings all around the state. He
has confided to Melissa that although he finds the drag racing is fun and exciting, he also
likes to be involved in it because of the prize money which he is personally able to keep, and
the fact that the company vice-president, Bill Breezeway, is also keen on drag racing and this
allows Roger to mix with the upper managers and directors of the company.
Craig Cattler is a morose character who is always finding fault with the work of others. He is
an industrial chemist with five years experience and Melissa suspects he has a drinking
problem. Frequently, after lunch, he smells heavily of booze and often disappears into a quiet
part of the laboratory, presumably to have a sleep.
Trudy Truesome is the technician in the section and therefore assists Brian, Roger, Craig and
Melissa in their research projects. She is in her mid 30s, is divorced, and has two small
children (ages 7 and 4 years). Trudy is quite good at her job and is a willing worker, although
she tends to be fairly stressed because of her family situation, and sometimes leaves critical
work undone.
Brian?s section of the Research and Development Division is concerned with research into
fuel additives. One of the projects they have been working on for the last 12 months is the
development of a new additive which will significantly increase the octane rating of normal
automotive fuels. The additive has been coded as KBC32. The project has been going well
and initial trials of KBC32 indicate that the product could be a lucrative money spinner for
? University of Southern Queensland
ENG3003 ? Engineering management 19
the company. Small quantities of KBC32 are stored in the laboratory, and each time some of
it is used the user must record details in a register and sign their name.
Roger has been suggesting to Melissa for some months that she should go along to one of the
Saturday night drag meetings that he is involved in, so that she can see for herself what drag
racing is about and how much fun it is. Melissa has resisted attending a drag meeting because
she is not interested and has always thought how boring it all sounds. However one Saturday
afternoon her friend Brooke Burton suggests that the two of them attend the drag meeting
that night and Melissa agrees so that she finds out what drag racing is about.
The drag meeting is of course quite crowded but eventually she spies Roger in the distance.
She is somewhat surprised when she realises that the woman with Roger is Trudy and they
are acting in a way which indicates that they are more than just friends. As she pushes her
way through the crowd towards Roger she suddenly becomes aware that Roger and Trudy
have been joined by Milton Steiner, head of Steiner Industries, a small but aggressive
petrochemical research company which is a rival to East Island Petrochemicals. This stops
her in her tracks and as she stands and watches she sees Roger handing to Milton a vial filled
with bluish-green liquid. She is shocked and dismayed as she realises that the liquid looks to
be KBC32. Her concern then turns to panic as she realises that the previous afternoon Trudy
had asked her to procure and sign for 25ml of KBC32. Trudy had said that Roger needed the
sample for some further testing, but could not leave what he was doing at that time to get the
sample. Melissa had been fairly busy herself but in order to help Roger expedite his testing
had signed out the liquid for him. If the liquid that Roger is now handing to Milton is
KBC32, then it is probably the sample that Melissa has signed for!
As she stands there stunned she sees Milton reach into his inner coat pocket and bring out a
brown envelope which he hands to Roger.
Identify and discuss the management and ethical issues involved in this case. What courses
of action would be appropriate for Melissa to follow (starting immediately)?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Please help Ali in making a decision by giving your views about:
1. What ethical dilemma (or problems) is Ali facing?
2. What issues does Ali have to deal with in this dilemma?
3. Which alternative(s) or solutions should Ali select?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]You are required to produce a critical assessment of the following book:
Pearson, P. (1998) When She Was Bad: Violent Women and the Myth of Innocence. Toronto: Virago Press Ltd
Guideline:
– Consider the context of the Book. When it was written and what was the social, economic and political climate when the book was published
– You evaluate the book. Identify the strength and weakness of the book in relation of the literature on the same topic. Your evaluation of the book should extend beyond your subjective experience. It should be based on your knowledge of the topic gained from your reading.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]