How significant is social class to identity today? Critically discuss with reference to Australia and the United Kingdom

Begin writing your essay! As you do so, keep in mind that better essays are those that develop a strong line of argument, which is well structured and balances description and critical analysis. Good questions to ask yourself are:

• ‘Does this point relate to the main ideas I want to get across or does it distract the reader’?

‘Does the point I am making answer the question? Does it relate to the point before and after it, and if so how?

• ‘So what? What is the significance of this point? Why am I writing about it?’

• ‘How can I prove my point?’ ‘What sources can I use to support my argument?’

• ‘Do I agree with the perspective presented in the source that I am discussing? Why/why not?’

• ‘How does the perspective of the author that I am discussing compare/contrast with some of

• ‘How does the perspective of the author that I am discussing compare/contrast with some of
the others?’ ‘What is unique/interesting about what this author has to say?’

At a minimum, students are expected to:
• Answer all components of the question and follow the academic protocols for essay writing.
• Refer to AT LEAST 5 academic sources (two of which should fall outside the scope of the set
readings) in developing/supporting their argument.
• Ensure that their essays are logically structured, coherent and free of spelling and grammatical
errors.
• Ensure that essays are correctly referenced and free from plagiarism.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Participatory Budgeting Project

1.As you walk through the UTSA campuses, consider what is needed by the student body. Rank order three projects you believe are needed.

2.Please submit a 1/2 -1 page description of the project, formally written, one-inch margins, single-spaced. Describe the project in great detail. Your answer must include but is not limited to the following questions:

Why is the project needed? Where will the project be located? What will the project look like?

3.Develop an itemized budget for your proposal.

4.In a 1-2 page paper, single spaced (1 inch margins, with name in the Header), construct a paper that answers the following questions:

Reflect on the experience itself – identifying the initial ideas as well as working in your groups.

How has the experience changed the nature of your relationship with your classmates?

Are you more or less likely to interact with your classmates the rest of the semester? Why?

Why is it important to incorporate citizen perspectives in shaping policy? What does this mean for governance?

How does participatory budgeting incorporate citizens in shaping policy? Be specific in your justification.

What is the problem you identified at UTSA?

What is your proposal? What is the budget?

How is your proposal an innovative approach to an identifiable problem? How does it work to solve the identified problem?

Organize your thoughts carefully before writing. Be sure you have answered all of the questions above.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Psychology Interviewing 6

Activity 6

Choose a role-play scenario from Activity 7.1 in your text; then, ask a friend to play one of the “client roles” listed in that section. Conduct a mock interview on that topic; and then videotape or audiotape the interview.

Following the interview, recreate and complete the checklist in Table 7.2 and complete the questionnaire in Activity 7.2. Locate at least three research articles published in peer reviewed journals on the topic of expressing feelings and immediacy in interviews.

Prepare a reflection paper that discusses your own progress in the appropriate use of questions. Then, address the following in your paper:
• Did you remember to use attending skills as well as practicing expression?
• How easy was it for you to identify your feelings?
• Do you feel confident in knowing which thoughts and feelings should be expressed and when to express them? If not, how do you think you can improve this skill?
• When you expressed your thoughts or feelings in the interview, what was the aim of sharing these?
• How did the “client” respond to your expressing of thoughts and feelings? What impact did this have on the session?
• What additional insights or questions arose from the research articles you read about expressing thoughts and feelings?
Length: 4-6 pages
Activity 7
Choose a role-play scenario from Activity 8.1 in your text, asking a friend to play one of the “client roles” listed in that section. Conduct a mock interview on that topic; then videotape or audiotape the interview.

Following the interview, recreate and complete the checklist in Table 8.1 and complete the questionnaire in Activity 8.2. Locate at least three research articles published in peer-reviewed journals on the topic of self-disclosure in interviews. As this is a classic technique, you may include classic or recent research.

Prepare a reflection paper that discusses your own progress in the appropriate use of questions. Then, address the following in your paper:
• Did you remember to use attending skills as well as self-disclosure?
• How easy was it for you to identify an appropriate topic for self-disclosure?
• Do you feel confident in knowing what to disclose and when? If not, how do you think you can improve this skill?
• When you did disclose something in the interview, what was the aim of this disclosure? Did you achieve that aim?
• How did the “client” respond to the disclosure? What impact did this have on the session?
• What additional insights or questions arose from the research articles you read about self disclosure?
Length: 4-6 pages

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Ethics in the Public Sector

You are an urban planner for the City of San Antonio. You work closely with other urban planners, Jack and Jill. The work Jack and Jill have done in the last several city comprehensive plans has brought a great deal of praise. The San Antonio Express-News ran a series of stories about Jack and Jill’s work, all positive pieces. One day, Jack asks Jill, “Why don’t we try to make some money as planning consultants? We can advertise online with a website and there would be low overhead. The costs would be minimal and as long as we don’t contract with clients doing business with the city department, there shouldn’t be any ethical or legal issues to contend with.”
Jill gives Jack’s suggestion a few days of thought and a week later they have a website in place. Their firm provides, among other things, market analysis, community planning, business site selection, and geographic information systems.
Although their website doesn’t identify Jack and Jill by name, it does note that they have local government experience as urban planners. Moreover, the page contains their firm’s email address and telephone number.
Two weeks later, Jack, while working on city time, receives a telephone call inquiring about his services as a consultant. You overhear the call. What do you do? Why? Justify your answer, very clearly.
Using the rubric below, write a case analysis that considers what you should do and why.
Required Sections Guidelines
I. Statement of the Problem
(25 pts) • State the problem(s) you face
• Identify and link the symptoms and root causes of the problem(s)
• Differentiate the short term from long term problem(s)
• Provide a detailed analysis of the problem(s) identified
-In the analysis, apply theories and models from the text, readings, and/or lecture
-Support conclusions and /or assumptions with specific references to the case and/or the readings
• Conclude with the decision you face
II. Decision Criteria and Alternative Solutions
(30 pts) • Identify criteria against which you evaluate alternative solutions for your decision
• Include two or three possible alternative solutions
• Evaluate the pros and cons of each alternative against the criteria listed
• Suggest additional pros/cons if appropriate
III. Recommended Solution, Implementation and Justification
(25 pts) • Use the decision criteria above to identify a solution.
• Discuss, briefly, how you would implement the decision.
• Be sure to discuss why you made this decision – why it’s the best alternative
IV. External Sourcing (10 pts) • You have your book, the handout, online sources at your disposal. Use them and cite them appropriately
VII. Spelling Grammar and Presentation (10 pts) • 2-3 page analysis, double-spaced with numbered pages
• Have 1inch margins – top bottom left and right
• Use 12 point font size
• Grammar and spelling – Be sure to edit your work
• Use APA or MLA format for citations

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Reflection Argumentative Paper on Julian of Norwich

Reflection Argumentative Paper Instructions – Please follow instructions 1-10 for Reflection Argumentative Paper
1. The paper should have a thesis, a main claim that the rest of the paper develops and supports, a unifying point that is argumentative which may or may not be controversial.
2. In writing the paper, avoid sources other than class texts, lectures, and discussions.
3. Discuss what a book “says” to you and how you responded in return.
4. Explain why it moves you, provokes you, or perplexes you-relating it to your own spiritual journey, if necessary, without turning the paper into an autobiography.
5. Ponder how key themes relate to one another and, if appropriate, how the text relates to its original context.
6. Avoid dwelling on a book’s significance for entire humanity or a large group of people, such as a particular race, gender, or class: rather focus on the effects it has had on you.
7. Do not write impressionistically; do not merely summarize the text; and do not recount others’ reflections on it, such as those in a preface or introduction. Put differently, do not just describe or analyze; also evaluate and take a position.
8. Think critically but civilly: use logic, eschewing fallacies, especially the ad hominem and straw man kind. You do not have to agree with an author’s claim; but before you disagree, be sure you have made good-faith efforts to understand his or her point of view.
9. A letter grade will be dropped for spelling, grammar, and diction. Written assignment will be graded based on content and writing competence.
10. The margin paper should be 1 inch from the top and bottom and from left and right; 5 to 8 pages; not counting cover page, and using Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced without gratuitous spacing or quotations. On style, follow Kate Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations: Chicago Style for Students and Researchers, 7th ed., rev. Wayne C. Booth et al. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).
A Reflection Argumentative paper is not a research paper, nor is it a book report. You share some of the conversation you have had with a text in a “think piece”.
YOU ARE TO ONLY USE THIS BOOK LISTED BELOW AS A RESOURCE:
Julian of Norwich. Julian of Norwich: Showings (Classics of Western Spirituality), New ed. Paulist Press: 1977.ISBN: 0809120917 Book has been copied and in my 4Shared account. I have broken book down into four sections in order for you to down load the 4 sections and numbered for you to complete order.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Studies in Literature

HUMN 142 Studies in Literature
Essay 2 Instructions
Essay 2 Assignment
Due Date: By 11:59 PM EST/EDT on the last day of Module 6
Use standard file format (.doc or .docx) and save the file as your last name2 (e.g., pratt2.doc).
Submit via the View/Complete link in Module 6.
Review “Aristotle’s Concept of Tragedy” (pp. 1203-1205) and Arthur Miller’s “Tragedy of the Common Man” (pp. 1831-1833).
Compose a three- to five-page essay on the following topic:
Decide for yourself what tragedy is, and then examine Oedipus the King and Death of a Salesman as tragedies. How are they different from or similar to one another? Realizing that 2400 years separate these plays, what do these differences/ similarities mean?
To successfully complete this assignment, document your evidence. Review “Document Sources Using MLA Style,” beginning on page 1978, and follow these guidelines:
 create a clear and limiting title (a title page will not be necessary)
 double-space your essay
 use standard margins
 number your pages
 set off and indent ten spaces, and double space quoted material over three lines
 proofread your essay carefully.
If you have any questions about this assignment, don’t hesitate to contact your Instructor.
This assignment may not be revised for a higher score.
Note: Essay 2 will be submitted to Safe Assign, a plagiarism detection service.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

A business plan on developing Chinese fast food Vending machine in UK

you will develop a short Business Plan, which will provide further details of your idea. The Business Plan will allow you to develop your ideas further and will include information on:
• Vision, mission, objectives and values of the company;
• Marketing research on the market, competition and environment;
• Objectives, milestones and goals;
• Risks and limitations of the idea;
• The organisation leading team;
• The resources required to support the idea;
• Marketing and sales strategies;
• Finances, income and expenditure;
• Legal and regulatory aspects;
You will be provided with a template, which will provide a guide and reminder of the key information needed. However, the idea and operation are yours. You can include any relevant information you wish, as long as it clearly relates to the information requested. You also will need to be concise and ensure only essential information is included, because you must include everything within the 3,000 words limit

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Buffy responsibility

This paper about Buffy in the series Buffy the vampire Slayer,
this is my paper important assignment. I will attach the sources that i need you to include in this assignment. also, i will attach also the proposal that includes the thesis that you should follow. please make it clear and easy to read by using simple word. you may use other resources as needs. You need to make argument between Buffy Responsibility for all seasons that’s mean as a child, as a sister after her mother death, and as a leader at the end

Instructions
Tips
-You may structure your essay in a variety of ways, using whatever methods necessary to fit your vision and topic. For example, you may group the portions of your argument into individual sections or chapters, giving each its own title. You may add appendices for graphics, tables, charts, or any other visual information. The only rule is that, if all the actual text of the essay were lined up, the paper must still be at least 7 full pages. In other words, you can’t use fancy formatting or structure to cheat the length.

-Make sure each body paragraph begins with a clear, strong, arguable claim. Follow it with brief and specific evidence. Analyze that evidence to show how it proves that your claim is correct. Connect those insights to the thesis (or subthesis, if you’re working in a subsection of the main argument). Rinse and repeat.

-Make sure Buffy is an integral part of your argument. You should not have a “Buffy section” somewhere that just shoehorns the series into an otherwise tangentially related essay. Your argument should not be about the series unless you’re doing a literary analysis sort of paper, but the series should connect to all of your major points and be present throughout the essay.

-You may lift passages from your research proposal and use them in your essay, so long as they make sense. For example, you might have a sentence in your first proposal paragraph that would go well in your essay’s introduction; that’s fine to use. However, this isn’t an invitation to lazily copy and paste in order to fill space. Your proposal cannot be the first page-and-a-half of your essay.

Format
The paper must be at least 7 full pages in standard MLA format: 1″ margins on all sides, Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced, with no extra paragraph spacing or extended headers/footers. The paper must include a works cited page that does not count toward the 7 page minimum.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Dialogue,Empathy and Care as a Foster Father

The question: How would you apply Dialogue, Empathy and Care as a foster care father?
The first part of the paper should have an explanation of Dialogue, Empathy and Care.
Examine the philosophical, social-psychological, spiritual, scientific, and historical dimensions of empathy, care, and dialogue in the Foster Care System. Explore the vitality of these leadership tools for conflict resolution, problem solving, reconciliation, and sustainable change in the Foster Care System and how the father’s role applies.
The following are the references as well as any other appropriate references:
Dalai Lama, The Good Heart: A Buddhist Perspective on the Teachings of Jesus (Boston: Wisdom Publications, 1998

Stewart Burns, ed., Cosmic Companionship: Spirit Stories by Martin Luther King Jr. (Amazon, 2013), Part 2: “Making the Wounded Whole”

Georgia Barnett & Ruth E. Mann, “Empathy Deficits and Sexual Offending: A Model of Obstacles to Empathy,” Aggression and Violent Behavior 18 (2013), 228-239

Elizabeth Marlow et al, “Nonviolent Communication Training and Empathy in Male Parolees,” Journal of Correctional Health Care 18 (2012: 1), 8-19

Nel Noddings, Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1984)

Nel Noddings, The Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality (Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 2010)

Virginia Held, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
(N.Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2006)

Maurice Hamington, Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Feminist Ethics (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 2004), Intro, Chaps. 1, 4, Conclusion

Marshall Rosenberg, Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life (Encinitas, CA: Puddle Dancer Press, 2003)

Desmond Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness (N.Y.: Random House, 2000)

Compassionate Listening Project, Practicing the Art of Compassionate Listening

Michael E. Morrell, Empathy and Democracy (Penn. State University Press, 2010)

Michael A. Slote, The Ethics of Care and Empathy (London: Routledge, 2007)

Richard Rohr, Eager to Love: The Alternative Way of Francis of Assisi (Cincinnati: Franciscan Media, 2014)

Maurice Hamington, Embodied Care (Univ. of Illinois Press, 2004), Chaps. 2, 3, 5

Nicholas D. Kristof & Sheryl WuDunn, A Path Appears: Transforming Lives, Creating Opportunity (N.Y.: Knopf,2014)

Desmond Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness, selected chapters
Film: Fambul Tok (2011)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

critically evaluates the leadership of change in your chosen organization

Select a programme of change your organization, or one with which you are familiar has recently
completed or is embarked upon and produce a business report of 3500 words (+/-10%) which
critically evaluates the leadership of change in your organization. This report should consider the
following phases identified in the Change Management Survey for Organizations:
a) Preparing for Change b) Planning for Change c) Implementation of Change

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]