Category: Essays

Analytical / Creative Writing
No sources allowed

Choose one of the following – Thomas Wyatt’s “My Lute, Awake!;”, Edmund Spenser’s, Amoretti, “Sonnet #37;” William Wordsworth’s “Three Years She Grew;” Oliver Wendell Holmes’ “The Chambered Nautilus;” or Percy Bysshe Shelly’s “England in 1819”

Demonstrate how the poet uses sound and rhythm to enhance the poem’s major images. Demonstrate an understanding of how the poet uses sound and rhythm to enhance the poems images. In their references, they are apt and specific. Though not without flaws, these papers will offer a convincing interpretation of the poem, as well as consistent control over the virtues of effective composition, including the language unique to the criticism of poetry. They demonstrate the writers ability to read and to write with clarity and sophistication.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Answer Case1 & 2 questions
case 1
1. What were the challenges for Vodafone New Zealand?
2. How did it address these issues?
3.List the tools used by Vodafone’s applications
4.What benefits are being derived from this initiative?
5.What can we learn from this case?

case2
1. What are some of the key questions to be asked in supporting (decision making through DSS?
2. What guidelines can be learned from this vignette about developing DSS?
3. What lessons should be kept in mind for successful model implementation?

_____________
1-please work Introduction about the case study 1&2 of 3 lines only.

2-answer questions and not to exceed 3 lines only for each question.

3-font size 8

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Review the fact pattern provided below. At this time, Mr. Kant stands convicted of either petit larceny or shoplifting, as dictated by your state statutes, and your office has been hired to handle the appeal. Based on your lessons and reading material regarding legal analysis and writing, legal research, legal citation and appellate procedure, prepare the appellate brief based on relevant statutory and case law from your state of residence. Proper format is outlined in Statsky on pages 600-602, and detailed in your state court rules, formbooks, etc.

Thoroughly research the issues involved and address the statute/s from your state under which Mr. Kant would be charged and convicted. Locate at least one binding opinion upon which to base your arguments and apply the opinion in a thorough and concise manner. You should also apply any relevant secondary authority that might be used in support of your arguments. In completing this assignment, please focus on demonstrating your research, analysis, citation and writing skills over format of the brief.

Bear in mind that you do not have access to the trial court record for this assignment, which would not be the case in an actual law office setting. Therefore, you may embellish the facts as necessary to fully develop your arguments. Use care, however, not to allow those embellishments to change the issues involved.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This week, you and your colleagues engaged in case study data analysis and interpretation in the Discussion board forum. For this week’s Application Assignment, you will review your final analysis and make recommendations for the school’s next steps.

For this assignment, imagine you are the assessment leader of the school in the case study. For the school’s next meeting of the School Improvement Team, you have been asked to share your key findings and to make recommendations for next steps based on your analysis of the data. To complete this assignment, create a PowerPoint presentation for the meeting. Your PowerPoint should include the following:

A summary of your final analysis and findings
Key questions the team should address in the meeting based on the data
Your recommendations for next steps based on your data analysis
What steps should the school take to improve student performance?
What are the next steps for assessing progress?
A rationale statement supporting your findings and recommendations. Be sure to cite information from the Learning Resources to defend your decisions

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Project “Blow Up” & Managing in a Foreign Land
Read “An Organizational Behavior Moment” on page 76 at the end of Chapter 2 and on page 114 at the end of Chapter 3.
Choose one of the two “Moments” and present your answer to the “Discussion Questions” at the end in a discussion posting, clearly identifying the topic chosen in the subject of the posting. Support your opinions by referencing sources such as the textbook or internet research.

require: Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-470-52853-2

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

• Case Study: Cooperating and Communicating Across Cultures
Read the Part I Case Study beginning on page 121 after Chapter 3. Write a paper using APA format including the following:
Identification and summary of the key organizational behavior issues evident in the case
Reflection on the identified issues along with recommendations or potential solutions to identified issues
require: Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., & Colella, A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN: 978-0-470-52853-2

Your paper should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Please include citations to support your ideas.
Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria.
Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts.
Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts.
Uses proper mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, and spelling.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Part 1: In the first part of your Final Project, you will write a 500–750 word analysis of one of the five case studies provided on pages 366–367 of the text. Select one of the case studies provided and apply clear ethical reasoning to it.

Review the rubric for this project by clicking on the Rubric icon on this page.

Your analysis paper will be formatted in APA format and include the following:
1.An introduction with a brief presentation of the facts in the case study and a clear thesis statement
2.Consideration of the factors of the case study.
3.Application of a specific ethical theory to defend your decision in the case study.
4.Demonstration of critical thinking with thoughtful analysis.
5.A clear conclusion that summarizes your decision in the case study.

Submitting your Assignment

Save your Final Project in location and file name that you will remember.

When you are ready to submit it, click on the Dropbox and complete the steps below:

•Click the link that says Submit an Assignment.
•In the “Submit to Basket” menu, select Unit 8: Final Project
•In the “Comments” field, include at least the title of your paper.
•Click the Add Attachments button.
•Follow the steps listed to attach your Word document.
•To view your graded work, come back to the Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Click the Dropbox to access it.
•Make sure that you save a copy of your submitted Final Project.

Part 2

The second part of the final project is due on the last day of Unit 9. Your final project in this course requires you to construct a portfolio that documents your successes in achieving key class objectives.

Your portfolio will contain examples of your coursework that portray your progress in attaining three primary course goals:
1.Analytical Skill Building: Improving your critical reading, writing, and thinking skills.
2.Knowledge Acquisition: Mastering knowledge of central concepts, ideas, and perspectives connected to your study of Ethics.
3.Practical Application: Learning how to connect course material to issues you care deeply about and thoughtfully apply course material to your own life goals, decisions, and practices.

Your portfolio can also include information about your work in other areas — for example, the work you did to achieve the personal goals you discussed in the icebreaker assignment.

You portfolio may include:

•Excerpts from your papers
•Examples of your reading notes
•Selected Discussion or Seminar interactions
•Comments from the grade book
•E-mail interactions with the instructor

Your Portfolio Project will also require you to reflect on your progress toward course goals, including your own evaluation of your work habits, reflections on any difficulties that you faced, or any special challenges that you overcame.

The Portfolio Project may be organized as a Microsoft Word document, a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation, or a multimedia document or presentation. Your instructor must approve alternative formats in advance.

No matter how the project is presented (upon instructor approval), it must demonstrate use of Standard American college-level English.

ID: HU280-08-09-FP

Textbook Information

Primary Title: Ethical Issues in Modern Medicine: Contemporary Readings in Bioethics, 8th Edition

Author: Bonnie Steinbock, Alex John London, John Arras

ISBN: 9780073535869
Physical text ISBN: 0078127424

Publisher: McGrawHill

Physical text or Digital Book: Digital Book

Software Requirements

Courses within the School of General Education may also require other software programs such as Microsoft® Word®, Excel®, Adobe® Reader®, Java™, Flash Player®, etc. See “Software Requirements” in the classroom under Course Home for the specific requirements for this class.

COURSE DESCRIPTION TOP

In this course, students develop and apply sound ethical reasoning and judgment to important issues in health care. Topics studied include access to health care, medical privacy, end-of-life care, genetic screening, and emerging genetic technologies. Emphasis is on practical applications of ethical principles and analytic methods.

COURSE OUTCOMES TOP

Course Outcomes: By the end of this course, you should be able to:

HU280-1: Identify ethical issues within the field of biomedicine.

HU280-2: Explain the effects of ethical decision making on human behavior as it relates to biomedicine.

HU280-3: Evaluate the reasoning of opposing perspectives on ethical issues within the field of biomedicine.

HU280-4: Explain ethical theories relating to biomedicine.

General Education Literacies (GELs): In addition, the following General Education outcomes are assessed during this course:

· GEL1.1: Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English.

· GEL7.2: Apply ethical reasoning to ethical issues within the field of biomedicine.

Professional Competency Outcome(s):

PC-2.3: Demonstrate integrity through the application of relevant codes of conduct and social responsibility within one’s profession.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Read and review the provided case scenario.
Respond to the following questions:
1. Do you agree with the court’s decision?
2. Is termination of nondisabled employees permissible when they have a prescription for the medication for which they tested positive?
3. Is there an ethical resolution to this case?

Case Scenario
Velma Sue Bates v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.
The issue is whether the employer’s drug testing policy is permissible under the American Disabilities Act.
Plaintiffs-appellees are seven former employees of Dura Automotive Systems who are challenging Dura’s drug testing policy under the Americans with Disabilities Act. In resolving the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, the district court held that an individual need not be disabled to pursue a claim under section 12112(b)(6) of the Act. The district court certified this issue for interlocutory appeal, which a panel of this Court granted. We now REVERSE the district court’s decision and hold that an individual must be disabled to pursue a claim under 42 U.S.C. 12112(b)(6).
The employees are 7 individuals who worked at Dura’s Lawrenceburg, Tennessee manufacturing facility. Dura manufactures glass window units for cars, trucks, and busses, and the Employees performed a wide range of jobs at Dura including driving tow motors, assembling windows, painting primer on frames, and trimming and water testing windows.
Dura grew concerned that the Lawrenceburg facility has a higher rate of workplace accidents that comparable plants and suspected that this might be caused by either legal or illegal drug use. To improve safety, Dura implemented a policy that prohibited employees from using legal prescription drugs is such use adversely affected safety, company property or job performance. Dura worked with an independent drug testing company to set up a procedure to screen its employees for substances it believed could be dangerous in the workplace. The resulting policy screened employees for 12 substances including those commonly found in legal prescription drugs such as Xanax, Lortab, and Oxycodone.
Each of the Employees tested positive for one of the 12 prohibited substances. In each case, the individual has a legal prescription for a drug containing that substance. Dura gave each of the Employees an opportunity to transition to drugs without the prohibited substances, but refused to consider letters from doctors stating that the Employees’ work performance would not be affected by the drugs. Eventually, Dura terminated the Employees when they continued taking medication with the prohibited substances.
The Employees sued, claiming that Dura’s drug testing violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. In resolving the parties’ cross motions for a summary judgment, the district court concluded that 6 of the employees are not disabled as a matter of law. The district court held that the Employees’ claim that Dura’s actions constituted an impermissible medical examination is best analyzed under section 12112(b)(6). The district court denied the Employees’ summary judgment motion, finding that there was a disputed issue of material fact as to whether Dura’s justification for the drug testing falls within the exception of the Act for testing that is job related and consistent with business necessity.
Dura then moved for clarification, asking the district court to determine whether individuals must be disabled in order to pursue claims under section 12112(b)(6), but, recognizing that there is a difference of opinion on this question, certified this issue for interlocutory appeal. A panel of this Court granted the petition for leave to appeal on the issue of whether an individual must be disabled to pursue a claim under section 12112(b)(6) of the Act. Section 12112 of the Act prohibits discrimination against a “qualified individual with a disability because of the disability.” 42 U.S.C. 12112(a) 2006. In pertinent part, this section provides:
(a) General Rule
No covered entity shall discriminate against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability of such individual….
(b) Construction
As used in subsection (a) of this section, the term “discriminate” includes…
(6) using qualification standards, employment tests or other selection criteria that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability or a class of individuals with disabilities unless the standard, test or other selection criteria, as used by the covered entity, is shown to be job-related for the position in question and is consistent with business necessity.
Although non-disabled individuals may bring claims under some provisions of the Act, the plain text of subsection (b)(6) only covers individuals with disabilities. The text of subsection (a0 and (b)(6) specifically refers to “qualified individual[s],” and not, as discussed below, a broader class of individuals such as “employees.”
A straightforward reading of this stature compels the conclusion that only a “qualified individual with a disability” is protected from the prohibited form of discrimination described is subsection (b)(6)—the use of qualification standards and other tests that tend to screen out disabled individuals.
For the reasons set forth above, we REVERSE the district court’s decision that non-disabled individuals can pursue claims under section 12112(b)(6) of the Act. On remand, the district court shall dismiss the claims of the non-disabled Plaintiffs under section 12112(b)(6) of the Act.
Judgment for Dura Automotive Systems

Moran, J. J. (2014). Employment law: New challenges in the business environment (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Conceptually, it should be approached like a research paper. Therefore, the
sessions that it should include are Introduction, Literature review, Aims and Hypothesis,
Methods, Results and Discussion with practical applications and conclusions.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Book- Contemporary Business Law By Henry Cheeseman. ISBN# 9780133578164

Page 1- Read Chapter 1 and complete Case 1.1 on page 16 and case 1.1, 1.2 on pages 17-18.

Page 2- Read Chapter 3 and answer the following questions: Case 3.1 Hertz v. Friend (page 52), Case 3.2 Facebook v. Banana Ads (page 53), Landmark US Supreme Court Case (International Shoe Company v. Washington) on page 54, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, and 3.5 on pages 59-60.

Page 3- Read Chapter 4 and answer the following questions: Case 4.2 Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores on page 67, Case 4.3 Murphy v. McDonald’s on page 69, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6 on pages 82-84.

Page4- Review Chapter 3 and 4. Then, watch the following video clip: https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Court_Sys.html.

Please answer the questions fully. For example, in 1.1 on page 17, is the statute fair? While it only asks for a yes or no response, you MUST provide reasons to support your response. It helps to incorporate the facts of the case problem into your answer.

All answers to follow this general format: 1) State your conclusion, 2) State the Rule of Law that you are relying on (this will become more apparent in the later chapters), and 3) Provide your analysis (your reasons for supporting the conclusion and rule of law).

Proper grammar and analysis are a large portion of your grade. Little to no credit is given for answers with only your opinion.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]