Find and analyze an example of faulty reasoning you have encountered in the news or on a website. Your analysis should address one or more issues covered in the Carroll reading: emotive content; double-speak in the form of euphemisms, jargon, gobbledygook,or false implications; hedging; weasel words; ambiguity and vagueness etc. Don’t try to cover everything: it is often best to focus on one example in detail.
Your analysis should be at least 300 words.
It is important that you include the link to the text you are analysing at the top of your entry. Alternatively, you could paste the text at the bottom of your entry.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]