Assignment – Interpreting Statistical Output for Data Analysis PowerPoint Presentation
Picot topic: In OR nurses doing a five minute scrub (P) what are the differences in the presence and types of microbes (O) found on natural polished nails and nail beds (I) and artificial nails (C) at the time of surgery (T)?
Purpose:
The purpose of this Assignment is to enable you to present the information that you gather from a systematic review on your PICOT topic. This activity will give you the experience to present what your research findings to others.
Directions:
Define the clinical key questions based on PICOT.
Briefly review the database selected for key clinical questions.
Identify the studies of the database search that are a Level I or II evidence.
Interpret the statistical results of the studies identified in Step 3.
Design a presentation.
Place results /overview of research in PowerPoint.
Length of the presentation should be 12–15 slides.
Follow APA format.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.
Assignment Requirements:
Before finalizing your work, you should:
be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)
consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Home) to make sure you have included everything necessary;
utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and
Your writing Assignment should:
follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;
use APA 6th edition format
Unsatisfacotry Satisfactory Average Excellent Score Weight Final Score
1 2 3 4
Defined Key Clinical Questions Did not clearly define clinical question for research Attempted to define clinical question, without any reference necessary for database search Vaguely defined clinical question without the reference necessary for database research Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) 0 20% 0.00
Database Review Did not provide a review of the evidence from a database search Provide a brief overview of database results, not clearly linked to high levels of evidence Defined database results clearly, without generating a key clinical question Defined database results clearly, generated from key clinical question database search results 0 20% 0.00
Level 1 & 2 Evidence Only referenced Level 5-7 evidence, based on expert opinion andcase study reviews. Referenced research results from Level 4 and below Only referenced Level 3 evidence Referenced randomized control study research and systematic review of randomized control studies (Level 1 and 2 evidence) 0 15% 0.00
Intrepretation of Statistical Results Attemped to provide an overview of the evidence reviewed, but lacked statistically significant data. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence and the intrepretation was inaccurate. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence. Provides a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. 0 30% 0.00
Length Less than 12 slides. NA NA Presentation length 12-15. 0 5% 0.00
Format/Style Did not follow APA format Major errors with APA formatting Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. 0 10% 0.00
100% 0.00
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]