Please check this work as well they both have the same comments. please revise
This is a good start, but what you’ve turned in doesn’t quite fulfill the requirements of this assignment. Please keep in mind that this assignment asks for two distinct sections:
First, the summary should be exactly 150-200 words in length. The summary should restate Etzioni’s points in an objective, unbiased manner. Every sentence should include an attributive tag, such as Etzioni suggests, Etzioni argues, etc. The summary should not include your opinions or hint at your opinions at all.
Second, the critical response should be at least 400-500 words in length (minimum). The critical response section needs to be focused on responding to Etzioni’s particular points/techniques at the writerly level. How did his specific approaches work or not work? Why? In other words, this section should be devoted to responding to Etzioni’s particular points/techniques (discussion of how/why what he did was—or was not—successful). You should also provide examples to support your points. Rather than conveying your opinions about the topic itself, this section should be about the successfulness (or failures) of the article, using specific examples to support your arguments (about the article). You might also consider previewing your points towards the beginning of the critical response and incorporating transitions throughout. Again, this section should be at least 400-500 words in length.
Right now, I have received an essay from you, but the summary is missing.
I look forward to reading your revision! In the meantime, please feel free to let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks and best wishes
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]