The CEO cannot afford to panic
Name
Institution
In reality, CEO face challenges everyday, which demand immediate solutions and a wide range of skills. Failure of taking immediate actions can collapse a company. The CEO ensures that the company is sufficient important in all basics to ensure effective work environment for employees and other management team. In regard to this, Gerald Smarten, the CEO of Kaspa financial services, was faced with a challenge of his lifetime.
While in the meeting with his management team, the building shook. Many people in the meeting were shocked and almost everyone rushed to the window to inquire what had occurred. It was such a traumatic experience to the management team. Even though the mayor had warned that, the strike of the natural gas facilities could incinerate downturn, Smarten could not comprehend the concept. Tension was all over, meanwhile, CNN was just reporting on the incident and emergency vehicles had surrounded the building. Many people from the subway were chocking and bloody. There was nothing confirmed yet on what caused the fire until the security chief contacted the police department and confirmed that it was a coordinated bomb explosion which also occurred in North station.
The chaos of the lost lives was tight, for this reason, Human resource manager had to work on census to find out the number of lost lives. Among the missing twenty three, three were the employees of Kaspa. Ideas on how to aid the victims differed, for instance, Schlesinger thought that by having a shelter for the victims would assist in saving lives.
As a result, Smarten brought Schlesinger thought to discussion with the other members. He called for a meeting which aim was to suggest on ways that victims would be helped. Each member was given time to debate on whether it was right to offer Kaspa towers as a temporary morgue as suggested by Schlesinger. According to Smarten, Schlesinger opinion seemed pleasant although no company had done this before. This argument was supported by kaczmarek who wondered how other people from the society would view. In his argument, it would destroy the company reputation. Additionally, the attorney believed that, the company would suffer damage of resources in that many people would end up not investing in the firm because of lack of trust.
Ethically, smarten believed that this would led to the firm name been tied to terrorist attack. However, he was not ignoring Schlesinger argument in that, he saw this as major way of rescuing the victims affected. In regard to this, Persono countered this as credit to the investors for being a firm that stepped up during crisis that in result would invest with the firm. On the contrary, Joan opposed the Persono idea in that, it would have effect on the employees, working in a morgue. Debates on whether it was right using a shelter for the dead bodies and the bleeding victim differed. After inquiring from the police, the request took some time and the management teams were safe in doing the right thing.
Concussion
As discussed in this paper, Smarten has attributed the quality of valuing other people’s suggestions and a strong desire for success. Unfortunately, he seemed to direct his team for discussion on whether it was right to offer a room for the dead bodies instead of making hasty decisions that would help the incidence.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]