Category: Essays

General Background
1.The Mission Viejo Medical Center (in the city of Mission Viejo, California) comprises two geographically adjacent institutions:a.Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center: Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center, and
b.Children’s Hospital at Mission (CHM): Children’s Hospital at Mission (CHM) https://www.mission4health.com/affiliations/choc-childrens-at-mission.html

2.The two hospitals serve — within less than a 10-mile radius — the populations of the following nine municipalities: Aliso Viejo, Ladera Ranch, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Forest, Mission Viejo, Rancho Santa Margarita, and San Juan Capistrano.
3.Retirement Communities:a.The city of Laguna Woods (https://www.lagunawoodscity.org/), is home to “Leisure World” (https://www.lagunawoodsvillage.com/), a retirement community of over 23,000 senior (55 years and above) residents.
b.The city of Mission Viejo is home to “Casta Del Sol”, a retirement community of more than 3,000 senior (55 years and above) residents.

4.Following the example and success of integrating a special children’s hospital, it is suggested for the purpose of CAP599 only, that an additional new hospital be built, catering to the special needs of the senior population, to be named: “Golden Age Hospital (GAH).”
5.The “CAP599 Consulting Team (CAP599CT)” has been tasked to research and develop a project feasibility plan for the future GAH.
Module 3 – Assignment – Organizational Structures and Functions
1.Based on the data gathered, the general picture you have obtained, and the results of the survey (as returned to you by your instructor), you will now focus on the organizational structure and functions for the proposed GAH and Community Clinic.
2.In order to do so, you will need to define/address the following points:a.Define the mission statement for the GAH and Community Clinic.
b.Prepare a simple organizational diagram, depicting the organizational structure (blocks) of the existing Mission Hospital (MVH), Children’s Hospital (CHOC), and the proposed Golden Age Hospital (GAH), and the community clinic (CC).i.Note what common services or functions they can share (e.g., blood bank and laboratory services, shared Operating rooms, pharmacy, etc.).
ii.Explain the organizational relationships between the structure blocks.

c.What is the recommended hospital size (number of beds)?
d.What major services/treatments will be offered based on your survey results at the GAH and the CC? At least six detailed services/treatments are required.
e.Physician–Hospital integration:i.How (if appropriate) will you integrate the services of physicians whose specialty is in geriatric treatment within the GAH /CC?
ii.Address the management aspects, not the clinical ones.
iii.You can choose and explain one of the organizational forms detailed in the following article: Cuellara, A. E. & Gertlerb, P.J. (2006). Strategic integration of hospitals and physicians. Journal of Health Economics. Volume 25, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 1-28. https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/gertler/working_papers/hospital_vi_5_10_02.pdf

3.Conclusions and Recommendations

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Compose a 700- to 1,050-word essay.

Describe the influence of Florence Nightingale on the evolution of nursing theory including

• the state of nursing theory prior to Nightingale.
• changes in nursing practice she instituted during her career.
• the effect these changes had on prevailing theories of nursing during her career.
• examples of how theorists after Nightingale expanded upon her ideas.
• how these changes continue to influence theory development today.

Cite a minimum of two scholarly sources.

Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Number of questions set: Three (ONE TO BE ANSWERED)
Answer one Question:
1. Using one or two main examples of a kind of wildlife tourism (e.g. whale watching, safari), critically discuss its positive and negative impacts. How can the negative impacts be reduced through better management?

2. Using one or two main examples of a kind of wildlife tourism, critically discuss what factors contribute to high quality of experience of visitors, and whether high quality experiences are always compatible with conservation of wildlife.

3. It has been argued that hunting – especially trophy hunting – can be considered as a sustainable form of environmental management, whilst also benefiting local communities. Review the relevant literature surrounding trophy hunting tourism and provide a balanced critique of the issues raised.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Test Development Proposal

Overview of Assignment Details:

Throughout the course, students will conduct research on instruments that are currently used to measure a particular construct, develop a new instrument to measure that construct, administer the instrument to participants, and report on data arising from those administrations. . Students are free to select any construct of their interest, such as some ability, a personality construct, or any kind of attitude or belief.

Over the six-week course, students will select a construct of interest (such as depression, anxiety, job satisfaction, etc.), conduct research on other popular instruments used to measure the same or similar construct, develop a 12-15 item instrument, administer the instrument to 3-5 participants, discuss the methods used to administer the instrument, provide a strengths and weaknesses/limitation section regarding the development of the instrument, and discuss ways to increase the reliability and validity of the instrument.

Test Development Proposal:

The goal of this final assignment is to integrate Step One, Step Two, and Step Three of your Test Development Proposal, as well as to discuss the methods used, provide a critique of the instrument you developed, and discuss the strengths and limitations involved in the study and with the instrument developed. The Test Development Proposal should be at least 15 pages (but not more than 25 pages), double-spaced, not including your title page, abstract, Appendix, and references page, and should contain the following sections:

a) A title page

b) Abstract

c) Rationale/Problem Statement: Explain your construct of interest. Make a case for why this construct is important to you, the field of psychology, or your specialization area. What specifically about your construct are you wanting to assess? Are there different characteristics or behaviors that can be assessed within your construct? For example, if measuring depression as a construct, would you want to measure the severity of depression or the symptoms related to depression? What are all the characteristics of depression? Would you be assessing all of the characteristics?

d) Research Question: Develop a research question addressing what you will be assessing.

Literature Review: Taken from Step Two, along with any required edits. Write a 7-8 page literature review on your construct of interest and the 5-7 instruments used to assess it. Thus, the literature review should explain your construct of interest thoroughly, as well as provide thorough reviews of the 5-7 instruments used to measure it. This is slightly different from other literature reviews, whereby the idea is to review and critique the study and findings. For this literature review you are not reviewing the study but rather are reviewing and critiquing the instrument based on what studies and other research have found. The idea here is review the instrument and its usefulness in measuring your construct. Thus, what does the instrument measure, how reliable and valid is it, and what are its strengths and weaknesses? What is lacking in the instrument which paves the way for the necessity of your newly developed instrument? How are these instruments different from what you will develop?

Use 5-7 scholarly resources, including mostly research studies and articles related to your construct and the instruments used to measure it. Information should be drawn from appropriate sources, such as professional journals, test publisher websites, and dissertations. Information gathered from sources must be appropriately cited, following APA guidelines.

Please be sure to include the following in your literature review:

· A thorough discussion of each instrument you review for your construct, including the name of the test, what the test is used for, whether the test is appropriate for this area, what the reliability and validity of the test is, and what reviewers say about the strengths and weaknesses of it with regard to assessing this construct

· What, in general, appears to be adequately assessed on each test with respect to the construct that you selected?

· What does not appear to be adequately assessed?

· Your literature review should justify your development of an assessment—is there a hole in what is currently being assessed that you can fill with your test? Make a case for why your proposed test would address an area that is not already well assessed.

e) Methodology: Provide detailed information regarding the scale that you developed, who the participants were, and how the scale was administered. Include the following:

· Participant Selection: Explain who your participants were (e.g. total number, gender, age, etc.) and how you selected them. Be as specific as possible, as if you were giving directions to someone on how to choose and obtain the participants. Include instructions on how informed consent was provided to the participants. Be sure to indicate whether each participant received and reviewed the consent form provided.

· Measures: Discuss the instrument you developed, including what the instrument measures, how many items were developed, what type of scale it is (e.g. rating scale, observation, multiple choice, etc.), and how you developed the instruments (e.g. did you use examples from pre-existing scales, etc.). Include a copy of the instrument in the Appendix.

· Data Collection: Discuss how and where the data was collected (e.g. was the data collected via an internet survey, a group setting, individualized administrations, etc.). Was the data collected in an office setting, house, etc.? Were the participants provided with explicit instructions on how to complete the scale?
f) Discussion: Include the following information, using at least 2-3 scholarly sources to support your discussion:

· Strengths and Weaknesses: Provide a thorough critique of your scale. What do you believe are the strengths of your scale? The weaknesses? Regarding test construction, are there any items that appear to be problematic or vague? Are the response choices clear and appropriate? Does the scale appear to measure the construct you have selected? How could you increase the validity of your scale?

· Ethical Considerations: Could your participants be harmed by your scale, either in taking it or after it is finished? Address this and other possibly relevant questions of ethics.

· Limitations: No research covers everything. What are the obvious limitations to this study/proposal?

g) References Page: The references page should be formatted according to APA style.

h) Appendix of your test development scale: Taken from Step Three, along with any required edits.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

5 key questions
1.what are we now (situation analysis)
2.what we want to be ?(marketing aims and objectives)
3.what is the best route to get there? (strategy)
4.what are the details of the plan (tactics)
5.how do we ensure arrival (communications and control)
essay should under the following structure

Executive Summary
1.External analysis
1.1 macro environment
1.2 market overview – competitor analysis, market size, growth rates, trends (mintel)
1.3 customer analysis – how currently segmented target market/ who they are
2.Internal analysis
-financial
-operation
-market mix effectiveness
-4p analysis (product, price,place,promotion)
3. SWOT analysis
4. Objectives
-mission
-SMART analysis
5. Strategic
-strategic thrust (porter five forces)
-core target markets
-positioning
-branding
6.Marketing programmes
7. Implementation and control
Schedule
Calendars

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Assessment Checklist
You should:
1) Choose one of the two topics listed below.
2) Engage with relevant themes and ideas from the lectures and tutorial
discussions.
3) Cite your sources by employing either Harvard, MLA, or Chicago
documentation style. Additional research, beyond the relevant chapter from
Bennett and Royle, is not required but optional. If you do undertake additional
research, this could include further readings suggested at the end of the weekly
lecture slides (you can obtain several of these through the “Readings and
Resources” section of vUWS) or scholarly research of your own. If you quote
from a lecture verbatim or paraphrase substantial passages from a lecture,
then you must cite it.
4) Organize the analysis around a central argument or “thesis” and provide
textual evidence to support its claims.
5) Employ an appropriate writing style with minimal spelling, grammatical, or
other errors.

Topic 1
“Some things go. Pass on. Some things just stay. I used to think it was my rememory. You
know. Some things you forget. Other things you never do. But it’s not. Places, places are
still there. If a house burns down, it’s gone, but the place—the picture of it—stays, and not
just in my rememory, but out there, in the world. What I remember is a picture floating
around out there outside my head. I mean, even if I don’t think it, even if I die, the picture
of what I did, or knew, or saw is still out there. Right in the place where it happened” (43).
“As long as the ghost showed out from its ghostly place shaking stuff, crying, smashing and
such—Ella respected it. But if it took flesh and came in her world, well, the shoe was on the
other foot. She didn’t mind a little communication between the two worlds, but this was an
invasion” (302).
Engaging with relevant ideas from the “Racial Difference” chapter, as well as either
“Ghosts” or “The Uncanny” in Bennett and Royle, answer the following question: How
does Morrison’s representation of the ghost in Beloved challenge racial
hierarchies?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Submit a 1000 word reflective piece on what you have learned from the module and if it has changed your views about how to study or issues about preparing yourself for employment/ post-graduation.
Consider what you, and/or have not, learned from the module and why this is the case.
Indicate how the module could be improved to help students have better awareness about their personal development and/ or for added value from studying.
Indicate what you wish to achieve from your studies and what your expectations are for the future.
Reflect on the type of work environment/ post-graduation activities you want such that it/they might be reconciled with your personal values. In other words what you feel comfortable with in relation to behaviour at work and/or the behaviour of the type of organisations you intend to work in.

You should also include a Personal Development Plan (PDP) covering the attributes you think you have, the goals you wish to achieve (develop) during the next year of study and how you might go about it. The word count for this element is 500 words.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Assignment – Interpreting Statistical Output for Data Analysis PowerPoint Presentation
Picot topic: In OR nurses doing a five minute scrub (P) what are the differences in the presence and types of microbes (O) found on natural polished nails and nail beds (I) and artificial nails (C) at the time of surgery (T)?
Purpose:

The purpose of this Assignment is to enable you to present the information that you gather from a systematic review on your PICOT topic. This activity will give you the experience to present what your research findings to others.

Directions:

Define the clinical key questions based on PICOT.
Briefly review the database selected for key clinical questions.
Identify the studies of the database search that are a Level I or II evidence.
Interpret the statistical results of the studies identified in Step 3.
Design a presentation.
Place results /overview of research in PowerPoint.
Length of the presentation should be 12–15 slides.
Follow APA format.

To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Home.

Assignment Requirements:

Before finalizing your work, you should:

be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above)
consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Home) to make sure you have included everything necessary;
utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors; and

Your writing Assignment should:

follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and;
use APA 6th edition format
Unsatisfacotry Satisfactory Average Excellent Score Weight Final Score
1 2 3 4
Defined Key Clinical Questions Did not clearly define clinical question for research Attempted to define clinical question, without any reference necessary for database search Vaguely defined clinical question without the reference necessary for database research Clearly defined key clinical question used to search evidence-based databank (i.e, Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, etc) 0 20% 0.00
Database Review Did not provide a review of the evidence from a database search Provide a brief overview of database results, not clearly linked to high levels of evidence Defined database results clearly, without generating a key clinical question Defined database results clearly, generated from key clinical question database search results 0 20% 0.00
Level 1 & 2 Evidence Only referenced Level 5-7 evidence, based on expert opinion andcase study reviews. Referenced research results from Level 4 and below Only referenced Level 3 evidence Referenced randomized control study research and systematic review of randomized control studies (Level 1 and 2 evidence) 0 15% 0.00
Intrepretation of Statistical Results Attemped to provide an overview of the evidence reviewed, but lacked statistically significant data. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence and the intrepretation was inaccurate. Attemped to provide a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. But, unable to clearly intrept stength of evidence. Provides a descriptive statistic overview of the evidence reviewed, inlcuding the sample size, p-factor and strength of evidence. 0 30% 0.00
Length Less than 12 slides. NA NA Presentation length 12-15. 0 5% 0.00
Format/Style Did not follow APA format Major errors with APA formatting Text, title page, and references page follow APA guidelines . Minor references and grammar errors Text, title page and references page follow APA guidelines. No grammar, word usage or punctuation errors. Overall style is consistent with professional work. 0 10% 0.00
100% 0.00

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Question:
Debate the utility of the knowledge of nursing theories and associated theoretical concepts in the process of assessing patient’s needs and implementing appropriate care.
Note: APA format and a minimum of two references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Question:
Theory critique and development serve as the underpinning for the progress of professional nursing. Please Justify.
Note: APA format and a minimum of two references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]