Write a claim letter: you as a customer service manager of Toyota want inform the customer some RAV4 SUV have a common small problem with the brake, not serious but all problems are covered by guarantee or warranty Custom Paper

Write a claim letter, you as a customer service manager of Toyota want inform the customer some RAV4 SUV have a common small problem with the brake, not serious but all problems are covered by guarantee or warranty. customers can go to the store fix the problem. example is in the additional files I uploaded. No reference.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

In vitro drug dissolution test Custom Paper

I did the lab today and the teacher gave us some paper about the experiment with some table , graph and question to answer them can you help me to answer this paper ?? ,, also I will upload paper with table and graph wrote by the teacher to explan to me what I should to do ,, Can you please do exactly what the teacher wrote please please I will be so thankful for you ?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The Constitution and Citizenship Custom Paper

Citations will come from the following reading’s only.
Dahl, What the Framers Couldn’t Know, pp. 7-39
Levinson, The Constitution as Creator of Second-Class Citizens, pp. 141-157
Analyze in ONE page

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Book Review Custom Paper

Hi! I am busy with a business seminar out of the country and I would like to pass up a Book review regarding “21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”.

To anyone that can provide me with a UNIQUE 5-7 page book review including 5-7 lessons learned that is not found in internet WITH RICH AND GOOD CONTENT, I will award them 4500 POINTS!

Those who copy paste and plagiarize content from the internet will be marked as low rated and will be conceded from the awarded points along with a bad feedback report to Chegg. Having redundancies in the Book Review will be disqualified as well since it is opposing GOOD CONTENT.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Medical Law And Ethics Custom Paper

There are three candidates waiting for a heart transplant. The first candidate is a 14-year-old girl named Sally. Sally is an only child, and her parents have been asking everyday about the status of a transplant. The second is a 42-year-old business owner named Don. He has offered to donate two million dollars to the hospital if he receives the transplant. Don, however, has many additional health issues that may limit his ability to fully recover even if he receives the transplant. The hospital would use his generous donation to provide services to many of its poorer patients and expand its community reach. The third candidate is 38-year-old single mother named Marie. Marie is also a recovering addict. She has not abused drugs or alcohol in years; however, her earlier use has taken its toll on her heart. Marie is the sole support for her two children, a 10-year-old boy and an 8-year-old girl. She currently works as a teen substance abuse counselor and speaks at local middle and high schools about her experience and recovery. You are the hospital administrator and must make the decision as to which candidate will get the heart. You will draft a memo to the transplant selection committee of the hospital. Your memo will include a review of the facts, an ethical analysis as to why you made your choice, and what ethical theory, (Utilitarianism, Right-Based, etc.…) best supports your decision. Your response should be at least 200 words in length.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Medical reform and impact on hospital system Custom Paper

For the most part, the SCOTUS decision and election affirmation was seen as a credit neutral event by the Big Three credit rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings. Although they differ in whether they view the law as positive or negative, the rating agencies generally expect rated borrowers to have sufficient time to manage these reforms with little effect on their credit quality, at least in the near or midterm.

Despite the prolonged uncertainty, the private sector had been preparing, albeit slowly, for the eventual enactment of the PPACA. Healthcare providers understand that their former ways of doing business are bound to change no matter what would have happened in Washington. Of greatest consequence is the expectation that future provider revenues will have less to do with patient volumes and more to do with clinical outcomes, quality and cost efficiency.

Providers that get good results for their patients and keep costs in check stand to be rewarded with performance bonuses, shared savings and other revenue enhancements. Those providers that fail to do these things can expect financial penalties which will affect revenues and ultimately tarnish a provider’s credit profile. “Accountable care” may still be gestational in most areas of the nation, but the concept appears to be taking hold and will eventually replace large portions of our existing fee-for-service system.

Hospitals/Health systems

As the PPACA’s health insurance provisions kick in, a drop in the number of uninsured patients could result in a significant reduction in a hospital’s charity caseload as well as its bad debt. But hospitals should continue to approach how they bill patients eligible for financial assistance very carefully. The PPACA does not relieve hospitals of the duty not to charge such patients artificially high prices nor does it change the fair collection requirements of prior law.

On average, Medicare and Medicaid patients account for more than 50 percent of the care provided by hospitals. Any expansion of these programs is likely to be a two-edged sword for hospitals. While more patients may end up being covered, declining reimbursement and greater risk-sharing with providers could offset any budgetary gains. Hospitals will need to pay as much if not more attention to their payor mix as well as to how they set and manage rates.

In the pursuit of improved clinical outcomes, growing importance will be placed on preventive health services. Greater clinical and financial alignment between hospitals and primary care physicians will be necessary if payors demand and reward lower cost alternatives to expensive hospital stays.

Hospitals also will increasingly need to provide or contract for a broader spectrum of care to manage population health in their communities. It will no longer be acceptable for hospitals to give their patients a list of post-discharge providers and then leave them to fend for themselves. If a hospital bears some responsibility for what happens to patients after they leave its facility, there will be a continuing duty to see that post-discharge care is provided in the most appropriate and least expensive setting. This aspect of accountable care will provide hospitals with an opportunity to diversify revenue by acquiring other providers along the continuum of care, for example, home health businesses and skilled nursing facilities.

Additionally, in order to maintain their favored status, tax-exempt hospitals will be required to conduct a community needs assessment every three years, then adopt and implement a strategic plan that meets those needs identified by the assessment.

Skilled nursing and assisted living facilities

Impending reimbursement cuts will threaten profitability as most of the revenues from skilled nursing and assisted living facilities are from Medicare and Medicaid. To reduce costs, the new law also encourages patients to receive home care services, which are less expensive than receiving skilled nursing or assisted living care. To remain profitable, facilities may have to raise prices for private pay patients to offset the losses from government reimbursements.

General recommendations for skilled nursing and assisted living facilities to prepare themselves financially for healthcare reform include changing a facility’s business model to diversify revenue streams, bundling services and contracting with larger providers. However, to succeed at accountable care, facilities will need to successfully manage high acuity care at a lower cost and reduce hospitalizations.

Access to capital

Both the 2012 elections and the Supreme Court’s decision on the constitutionality of the PPACA have brought a measure of stability to the bond market as evidenced by an increase in new money issuance. Hospital providers that have delayed capital spending for the past few years are now reconsidering entering a favorable interest-rate market. With an increased appetite from investors for tax-exempt bonds, conditions are favorable for hospitals to achieve a lower cost of capital.

A recent example of this, not long after the SCOTUS decision, was Kennedy Health System of Cherry Hill, N.J. The 596-bed, multi-campus hospital took advantage of the strong healthcare market for rated credits to issue $66 million in tax-exempt revenue and refunding bonds. A part of the proceeds will finance new projects. The market responded positively to the offering, so much so that the hospital obtained improved pricing as a result of high demand. The result was an exceptionally low cost of capital while preserving maximum flexibility for the borrower.

With the outcome of the elections, most market participants anticipate income tax rates going up which has led to a surge in demand for tax-exempt municipal bonds. As evidence of this, municipal bond funds have seen heavy inflows of new money as investors look towards investments with some degree of tax advantage. This anticipated demand for tax-exempt bonds should lead to continued favorable conditions for non-profit hospitals as they look to refinance existing debt or fund strategic projects.

In general, capital will be more available to investment-grade hospitals and health systems and continuing care retirement communities. As health reform progresses, credit ratings may be more difficult to maintain given the anticipated decline in hospital volumes which should result in thinner profit margins. In addition to an organization’s credit profile, credit rating agencies will look at quality factors, such as outcomes, much more closely than they have in the past.

Most industry observers agree that the PPACA will have important ramifications for the health care sector as well as the broader economy. Like any landmark legislation, the ripple effects on American society could last for decades. More than ever, decisions made by healthcare providers today require both a sound understanding of the law’s financial impact and some reasonable level of confidence that adequate capital will be available to bring about those decisions. Because neither of those prerequisites is a certainty at present, the authors of this article strongly recommend spending time with the rules and regulations now being issued by Washington and applying to them to your particular situation.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Finance Essay: Danforth And Donnalley Laundry Products Company Custom Paper

Danforth & Donnalley Laundry Products Company
Determining Relevant Cash Flows
At 3:00 p.m. on April 14, 2010, James Danforth, president of
Danforth & Donnalley (D&D) Laundry Products Company,
called to order a meeting of the financial directors. The purpose
of the meeting was to make a capital-budgeting decision with respect
to the introduction and production of a new product, a liquid
detergent called Blast.
D&D was formed in 1993 with the merger of Danforth
Chemical Company (producer of Lift-Off detergent, the leading
laundry detergent on the West Coast) and Donnalley Home Products
Company (maker of Wave detergent, a major Midwestern
laundry product). As a result of the merger, D&D was producing
and marketing two major product lines. Although these products
were in direct competition, they were not without product differentiation:
Lift-Off was a low-suds, concentrated powder, and
Wave was a more traditional powder detergent. Each line
brought with it considerable brand loyalty; and, by 2010, sales
from the two detergent lines had increased ten-fold from 1993
levels, with both products now being sold nationally.
In the face of increased competition and technological innovation,
D&D spent large amounts of time and money over the
past 4 years researching and developing a new, highly concentrated
liquid laundry detergent. D&D’s new detergent, which they
call Blast, had many obvious advantages over the conventional
powdered products. The company felt that Blast offered the consumer
benefits in three major areas. Blast was so highly concentrated
that only 2 ounces were needed to do an average load of
laundry, as compared with 8 to 12 ounces of powdered detergent.
Moreover, being a liquid, it was possible to pour Blast directly on
stains and hard-to-wash spots, eliminating the need for a pre-soak
and giving it cleaning abilities that powders could not possibly
match. And, finally, it would be packaged in a lightweight, unbreakable
plastic bottle with a sure-grip handle, making it much
easier to use and more convenient to store than the bulky boxes
of powdered detergents with which it would compete.
The meeting participants included James Danforth, president
of D&D; Jim Donnalley, director of the board; Guy Rainey,
vice-president in charge of new products; Urban McDonald,
controller; and Steve Gasper, a newcomer to the D&D financial
staff who was invited by McDonald to sit in on the meeting. Danforth
called the meeting to order, gave a brief statement of its
purpose, and immediately gave the floor to Guy Rainey.
Rainey opened with a presentation of the cost and cash flow
analysis for the new product. To keep things clear, he passed out
copies of the projected cash flows to those present (see Exhibits 1
and 2). In support of this information, he provided some insights
Exhibit 1: D&D Laundry Products Company Forecast of Annual
Cash Flows from the Blast Product (Including cash flows
resulting from sales diverted from the existing product lines.)
Year Cash flows Year Cash flows
1 $280,000 9 $350,000
2 280,000 10 350,000
3 280,000 11 250,000
4 280,000 12 250,000
5 280,000 13 250,000
6 350,000 14 250,000
7 350,000 15 250,000
8 350,000
| Capital Budgeting
Exhibit 2 D&D Laundry Products Company Forecast of Annual
Cash Flows from the Blast Product (Excluding cash flows resulting
from sales diverted from the existing product lines.)
Year Cash flows Year Cash flows
1 $250,000 9 $315,000
2 250,000 10 315,000
3 250,000 11 225,000
4 250,000 12 225,000
5 250,000 13 225,000
6 315,000 14 225,000
7 315,000 15 225,000
8 315,000
as to how these calculations were determined. Rainey proposed
that the initial cost for Blast include $500,000 for the test marketing,
which was conducted in the Detroit area and completed in
June of the previous year, and $2 million for new specialized
equipment and packaging facilities. The estimated life for the facilities
was 15 years, after which they would have no salvage
value. This 15-year estimated life assumption coincides with
company policy set by Donnalley not to consider cash flows occurring
more than 15 years into the future, as estimates that far
ahead “tend to become little more than blind guesses.”
Rainey cautioned against taking the annual cash flows (as
shown in Exhibit 1) at face value because portions of these cash
flows actually would be a result of sales that had been diverted
from Lift-Off and Wave. For this reason, Rainey also produced
the estimated annual cash flows that had been adjusted to include
only those cash flows incremental to the company as a whole (as
shown in Exhibit 2).
At this point, discussion opened between Donnalley and
McDonald, and it was concluded that the opportunity cost on
funds was 10%. Gasper then questioned the fact that no costs
were included in the proposed cash budget for plant facilities that
would be needed to produce the new product.
Rainey replied that, at the present time, Lift-Off’s production
facilities were being used at only 55% of capacity, and because
these facilities were suitable for use in the production of
Blast, no new plant facilities would need to be acquired for the
production of the new product line. It was estimated that full production
of Blast would only require 10% of the plant capacity.
McDonald then asked if there had been any consideration of
increased working capital needs to operate the investment project.
Rainey answered that there had, and that this project would
require $200,000 of additional working capital; however, as this
money would never leave the firm and would always be in liquid
form, it was not considered an outflow and hence not included in
the calculations.
Donnalley argued that this project should be charged something
for its use of current excess plant facilities. His reasoning
was that if another firm had space like this and was willing to rent
it out, it could charge somewhere in the neighborhood of $2 million.
However, he went on to acknowledge that D&D had a strict
policy that prohibits renting or leasing any of its production facilities
to any party from outside the firm. If they didn’t charge for
facilities, he concluded, the firm might end up accepting projects
that under normal circumstances would be rejected.
From here the discussion continued, centering on the question
of what to do about the lost contribution from other projects,
the test marketing costs, and the working capital.
Questions
1. If you were put in the place of Steve Gasper, would you argue
for the cost from market testing to be included in a cash
outflow?
2. What would your opinion be as to how to deal with the question
of working capital?
3. Would you suggest that the product be charged for the use
of excess production facilities and building space?
4. Would you suggest that the cash flows resulting from erosion
of sales from current laundry detergent products be included
as a cash inflow? If there was a chance of
competitors introducing a similar product if you did not introduce
Blast, would this affect your answer?
5. If debt were used to finance this project, should the interest
payments associated with this new debt be considered
cash flows?
6. What are the NPV, IRR, and PI of this project, both including
cash flows resulting from sales diverted from the existing
product lines (Exhibit 1) and excluding cash flows resulting
from sales diverted from the existing product lines (Exhibit 2)?
Under the assumption that there is a good chance that competition
will introduce a similar product if you don’t, would you
accept or reject this project?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]