Category: Essays

Write 4 paragraphs, first paragraph is introduction, summarize those stories in 3-4 sentences each story. second paragraph write Gogol, first sentence is topic sentence about the name, then write 4 questions which is related to the topic sentence, then answer your each questions. Second paragraph about spiled man, topic sentence about Discrepancy between rich and poor, write 4 questions then answers your own questions. fourth The teacher, topic about the absence of true spiritualism, also ask for questions by your own which is related the topic sentence and then answer your own question.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

I would like to not have the case study done just like the example. I know the teacher is looking for individual ingenuity and creativity.

My Chapter is on Corporations. The book for the class is Business Law Volume 2 Miller/Cross, Cengage Learning 2009.

Case Study Instructions:
1. Each student will be required to create a hypothetical business in which he/she is the owner and chief operating officer. You will describe your business by indicating what it does, how many employees it has, what type of business entity it is (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, Limited Liability Company ((LLC)). This same hypothetical (or real) business may be referred to in each hypothetical (case study) if you choose (you can create a new business, if you wish). On the week you have been assigned to post, you will create a fictional legal scenario (legal problem concerning the business  also referred to as a case study) involving an issue covered in the current weeks reading and apply the legal principles found in your textbook readings to your hypothetical business. If the students business is a shoe store, the student might explain how the issues covered in the current weeks readings affect his/her shoe store. For example, if the weeks readings covered the legal issue of breach of contract, the student might create a scenario in which an unhappy customer wants to return a pair of six month old, previously worn shoes. Further, the student will explain any legal options that might be open to the business owner, as well as to the customer and how those legal options would probably get resolved. This posting should be 400 to 500 words and should include the identity (or link) to any references used, and any additional information or research deemed pertinent by the student. A sample case study will be posted in the Course Documents module in Blackboard.

2. The idea here is to stimulate discussion with and among your classmates and to generate genuine interest and excitement for the class. Outside research shared with the class is required to receive full credit. Use your ability to create links, or any other online tool available to you. Do not use Wikipedia as a resource although that website is informative, it is also collaborative and not suitable for scholarly writings. Points will be awarded based on the quality of writing (grammar, punctuation, spelling, word usage, etc.), the quality, relevance and complete nature of the submission; the students explanation of why the issue is of significance to business administration students; and the outside research and insight you bring to the class. The idea here is to have fun while learning.

3. You might create a scenario using funny or interesting names, the situation might be humorous or ironic, etc. Please remember to always be respectful and professional (see netiquette at .

*Student Case Study Example
Student Case Study (13.01 Kb) (Below)

Hi. Many students have asked for an example of an acceptable case study. I have attached an excellent case study submitted by a student in the Fall Term (with permission). I have hesitated to post examples in the past because students tend to “model” their work to the example without showing individual ingenuity and creativity. This is just an example (and an excellent and complete one at that). You may use whatever style or format you wish, so long as the submission falls within the parameters of the assignment.
You have the option of using interesting or comical names, creative and “pithy” examples, etc.

**Example**
William-Shannon Investments, LLP
14500 Peach Blossom Blvd. suite 0002
Atlanta, Georgia 14500-0002
*Company Background
WSI is a limited liability partnership with its main headquarters in Atlanta and 28 eco-friendly properties in exotic locations across the globe. My partner Shannon and I are the two general partners and the 5 limited partners include our collective parents. WSI is proud to have luxurious, villa- style bungalows, deluxe condominiums, and penthouses in some of the most beautiful and pristine natural locations. Our exclusive clients enjoy a private paradise location which provides a charming and satisfying sense of home as well. We offer 11 floor plans to choose from with private and semi-private homeowner options. WSI’s mission is to provide the very best services, hospitality, and amenities to our clients to ensure them a private and safe family atmosphere. We take pride in the professionalism of our employees who provide these services to our guests. Our employees allow our guests to relax, undisturbed with the respect and privacy they are entitled to. WSI requires all employee candidates to submit to pre-employment drug and alcohol screening, a background check of previous employers and criminal history. New employees are trained thoroughly in their job duties in order to perform them to our standards. Our employees are given a company handbook and asked to read it from cover to cover. The employee is then asked to sign several acknowledgements that he or she is aware of WSI’s company policies. These policies include sexual harassment, pay rates and pay schedule, equal opportunity employment, dress code, benefits, and several others.
*Legal Issue
A cabana attendant at our resort property in beautiful Ma’alaea Cove in Maui has recently been terminated after several verbal and written warnings for his violation of our sexual harassment and dress code policies. The cabana attendant was seen wearing his pants below his waist, exposing his underpants to several co-workers. The other employees felt like it was a case of reverse sexual harassment, the issue was addressed with a verbal warning. A week later, a guest noticed the cabana attendant’s underpants when he lifted his shirt to wipe sweat from his brow. Management was informed and the employee received a written and final warning. Management stressed that he was not to wear his clothing in a manor that would expose any part of his underpants. The employee was also told that employees are required to have their shirt tucked in while at work. The employee followed policy for another week when another client, an owner this time, witnessed the employee remove his shirt, loosen a belt, and expose his underwear. The employee was observed by several people walking across the grounds towards a parking lot and eventually to a parked car in which he entered and left the premises. Management was made aware of this by the very angry and embarrassed owner, who was entertaining his grandchildren at the time the employee removed his shirt and loosened his belt. The employee was terminated the following day upon his arrival to work.
*Resolving the Legal Issue
The employee explained that he was off duty, that he had just punched out, on his way to his car, and was “really, really hot.” We reminded him that after his first two warnings, that the violations would no longer be tolerated due to the prestigious nature of our clients and the value we hold in our wonderful properties. After termination, the employee sought an attorney, who made us aware of his client’s intent to sue WSI for wrongful termination based on discrimination. The former employee’s attorney argued that WSI discriminated against his client’s way of dress, because the position of his pants, in proximity to the waist, was not clearly defined in the employee handbook’s section about the dress code. WSI and our attorneys argued that the employee was made aware of the policy after the initial complaint and subsequent warning. The second instance was considered insubordination and the third violation became reasonable cause for termination. The lawsuit was dropped by the former employee when WSI agreed to proceed with the suit and was uninterested in settling out of court.

References
http://www.employer-employee.com/sexhar1.htm

http://www.ehow.com/how_2311229_handle-reverse-sexual-harassment.html

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Upper Iowa University

Senior Project Learner Guidelines—Online
Project Paper: 15-20 pages, addressing a new initiative, need, situation, issue or problem identified by a learner by contacting an organization (business, community organization, agency, school, learner’s employer, etc.) or by searching the literature in your major.

To consist of:

Description of a new initiative, need, situation, issue or problem, and identification of an organization.

Plan 1. You will need to identify an organization that deals with the issues of your major. Find a contact person in the organization and discuss your assignment with that person. You will need to have an understanding of the organization itself in order to do problem solving. Make sure that your contact person understands that you will send him or her a copy of your paper and an evaluation form. The evaluation form needs to be filled out and returned to the UIU Center at the end of the project.

OR

Plan 2. Identify a new initiative, need, situation, issue, or problem that exists in your major area of study. Utilize information that is publicly available to define the focus of the paper. Also identify an organization that might benefit from the solution that you will develop

Background information—including a literature search, interviews etc. utilizing at least 10 different references cited in A.P.A. style in your paper and listed in your reference list. Investigate the background of the problem, need, situation or issue that you have identified. Use current references citing them in A.P.A. style. You may also want to interview experts in the area.

Proposal of at least two solutions or recommendations. After analyzing the information you have collected, propose at least two solutions or recommendations for the new initiative, need, situation, issue, or problem. Identify each one in a separate section of the paper.

4. Evaluation of the solutions or recommendations and choice of the primary solution or recommendation with a rationale for that choice. Evaluate your proposed solutions or recommendations. Decide which one best meets the needs of the organization. Give a detailed rationale for your choice. Be sure to address all the areas that you will be evaluated on. Consult the evaluation form for your major. At least 80% of the Senior Project must be your own reasoning and analysis.

5. Format:

Typed, double spaced, using a 12 pt. Font
Header in the upper right hand corner of each page with last name and page number
One inch margins on all sides of the page
First page of the paper, upper left corner, name, title, major, date
Cite sources using A.P.A. within the paper
Reference list using A.P.A.

Senior Project Evaluation – Management Major
Part 1 – Evaluation of the General Education Outcomes
Key for Part 1:
10-9 = Excellent. The learner has addressed this item in a complete, thorough and in-depth manner that goes beyond expectations.
8-7 = Good. The learner has addressed this item in a manner that exceeds expectations.
6-5 = Satisfactory. The learner has addressed this item in an acceptable manner. It neither exceeds nor does it fall short of expectations.
4-3 = Passing. The learner has demonstrated some knowledge in this area, but overall the learner’s knowledge appears to be shallow and/or incomplete.
2-0 = Unacceptable. The learner demonstrates knowledge in this area that is nonexistent, incomplete, inaccurate, and/or poorly communicated.
Communications
This project demonstrates:
1. Critical reading that is       10 points
2. Clarity in writing that is       10 points
3. The use of APA citation methods that is       10 points
4. Integration of published or unpublished work (intellectual property) that is       10 points
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
This project demonstrates:
5. Definition of a new initiative, need, situation, issue or problem that is       10 points
6. The ability to distinguish between fact and opinion that is       10 points
7. The proposal and evaluation of solutions that is       10 points
8. The defense of a rational conclusion that is       10 points
Quantitative/Qualitative Reasoning
This project demonstrates:
9. Inductive and/or deductive reasoning that is       10 points
10. Quantitative or qualitative assessment skill that is       10 points
11. Logical development and analysis that is       10 points
Information Technology
This project demonstrates:
12. The ability to transform raw data into information that is       10 points
13. The use of information to aid problem solving that is       10 points
14. The use of support materials (graphs, charts, visual aids, etc.) that is       10 points
Global and National Diversity
This project demonstrates:
15. Recognition of divergent cultural perspectives that is       10 points
16. Recognition of global interdependence that is       10 points
Social Responsibility
This project demonstrates:
17. Awareness of the mutually dependent relationship between human beings
and their environment that is       10 points
18. Awareness of the impact of technology on the human environment that is       10 points
Understanding of Humanities
This project demonstrates:
19. Creativity that is       10 points
20. An integration of ethical awareness that is       10 points

Subtotal Part 1:       of 200 points

Learner’s Name:    Evaluator: Steve Grothe/Greg Beatty
Center: Online Term: T2:09-10 ID #: 49801
Senior Project Evaluation – Management Major
Part 2 – Evaluation of the Business Core Outcomes
Key for Part 2:
25-23 = Excellent. The learner has addressed this item in a complete, thorough and in-depth manner that goes beyond expectations.
22-20 = Good. The learner has addressed this item in a manner that exceeds expectations.
19-17 = Satisfactory. The learner has addressed this item in an acceptable manner. It neither exceeds nor does it fall short of expectations.
16-14 = Passing. The learner has demonstrated some knowledge in this area, but overall the learners knowledge appears to be shallow and/or incomplete.
13-0 = Unacceptable. The learner demonstrates knowledge in this area that is either nonexistent, incomplete, inaccurate, and/or poorly communicated.
Refer to the Management Major Goals for further information on these goals.

Each question is worth 25 points. Use the key to determine the points earned.

This project demonstrates accounting skills that are:  25 points
This project applies marketing concepts in a way that is:  25 points
This project applies relevant principles of finance in a way that is:  25 points
This project applies management concepts in a way that is: 25 points
This project reflects organizational behavior principles and the impact of diversity on the organization in a way that is:  25 points
This project addresses relevant aspects of human resources management in a way that is:  25 points
This project applies the fundamental components of operations management in a way that is:  25 points
This project proposes solutions that demonstrate a legal understanding of business that is  25 points
This project addresses the economic environment and policies that affect businesses at a level that is:  25 points
This project demonstrates socially responsible and ethical business practices in a way that is: 25 points
This project includes the use of information systems in a way that is:  25 points
This project demonstrates quantitative and statistical reasoning skills in a way that is:  25 points
This project integrates a global view of business and evaluates the impact of international differences in a way that is: 25 points
Subtotal Part 2: of 325 points

Learners Name: Evaluator: Steve Grothe/Greg Beatty
Center: Online Term: T2:09-10 ID #: 49801

Senior Project Evaluation Management Major
Part 3  Evaluation of the Management Major
Key for Part 3:
35-32 = Excellent. The learner has addressed this item in a complete, thorough and in-depth manner that goes beyond expectations.
31-28 = Good. The learner has addressed this item in a manner that exceeds expectations.
27-24 = Satisfactory. The learner has addressed this item in an acceptable manner. It neither exceeds nor does it fall short of expectations.
23-20 = Passing. The learner has demonstrated some knowledge in this area, but overall the learner’s knowledge appears to be shallow and/or incomplete.
19-0 = Unacceptable. The learner demonstrates knowledge in this area that is either nonexistent, incomplete, inaccurate, and/or poorly communicated.
Refer to the Management Major Goals for further information on these goals.

Each question is worth 35 points. Use the key to determine the points earned.

This project explores the social, cultural, and behavioral foundations of human enterprise in a way that is:  of 35 points
This project applies current theories and practices developed to improve quality and productivity in a way that is:  of 35 points
This project applies rational problem solving skills, communication techniques, and critical thinking skills to management in a way that is 35 points
This project recognizes the different perspectives of labor and management in a way that is: of 35 points
This project identifies the managerial, marketing, and financial aspects required for an entrepreneurial venture in a way that is: of 35 points

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This assignment is worth 20 points. Be sure to answer it in detail and depth. I need to see that you understand the concepts.

Define temperament, and describe Thomas and Chess’s three temperamental styles. Discuss the influence of the goodness-of-fit between these styles and the environment on personality development.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

like the first topic paragraph format writing. 3 paragraphs. intro, write 3 sentences about em buddilhsm( suffering/ beauty) nature 2 sentences, mind 2 sentences.and write a thesis( en buddilhsm/ nature/ mind)
2nd paragraph is nature. write a topic sentence that I showed you. then ask 4 questions about (haiku, the hut, understand beauty and teacher/experience) 3rd paragraph about mind. topic sentence then 4 questions and answer your own question( the moon, the priest, idea of mindfulness and details meditation. need transition sentances between those paragraphs. all the material that I give you is talk about en buddilhsm.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Part # 1
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Write 5 paragraphs at least # 1
Purpose
To assess your ability to:
create alternative dispute resolution (ADR) strategies
manage difficult situations using alternative dispute resolution strategies
-Overview
This assignment will require you to create your own alternative dispute resolution strategy and then apply your strategy to manage conflict. To assist you with this assignment, review the Change, Conflict, and Alternative Dispute Resolution information.
Action Items
Review the Change, Conflict, and Alternative Dispute Resolution information.(look in file section)
Create a formal proposal, including an executive summary addressed to your supervisor that presents an alternative resolution strategy to be formally implemented and required by all managers within your department. Make sure the proposal includes the following:
The created alternative dispute resolution stratetgy
A list of key communication skills needed for successful use of the strategy
A description of how the strategy will be communicated to employees
A recommendation for training if necessary
A discussion of how the strategy can benefit the organization/department from a legal perspective
After completing your proposal, apply the strategy to three (3) types of situations that you have experienced in your department that included conflict. Specifically;
conflict between two employees
conflict between employee and a patient
conflict between an employee and a customer or other non patient/department personnel.
Apply your strategy to each of your examples, and determine if the outcome would have been different if you had applied the strategy at the time of conflict.
Summarize your applications in a 5 paragraphs paper.
Grading Criteria
ADR Strategy Proposal: 0 -40 points (2 paragraphs)
Situation Application Summary: 0 – 40 points (3 paragraphs)

Part # 2
Grief Brochure and Constructive Feeback
Open their files in file section and write 2 paragraphs each.

Action Items
Constructive Feeback ( Reflecting on the Overview information in file opened and write 2 paragraphs)
Grief (Reflect on your own personal experiences with the grieving process.
Based on your reflections and your readings, create brochure to give to staff, patients, or patient family members that explains the stages of grief and lists support services in your area.
Reflect on the public duty responsibility of health care professionals in your particular field and write 2 paragraphs)

Part # 3
Review these 3 SCENARIOS and write at least 2 small sentences of respond for each Scenarios.

1 Public Duty Scenario Physicians

(Physicians The patient-physician relationship is essentially a contractual relationship. The physician is under no duty to treat (accept) a patient. Whether the patient can pay or not, and regardless of the patient’s medical condition, a physician is not legally obligated to treat. A Texas court asserted: Since it is unquestionably the law that the relationship of physician and patient is dependent upon contract, either expressed or implied, a physician is not to be held liable for arbitrarily refusing to respond to a call of a person even urgently in need of medical or surgical assistance provided that the relationship of physician and patient does not exist at the time the call is made or at the time the person presents himself for treatment. [Childs v. Weis, 440 S.W. 2nd 104 (Tex.Civ.App.1969)] It is assumed therefore, that a relationship exists between the physician and the patient, and that relationship is, from the beginning, a contractual and voluntary relationship. [Agnew v. Parks, 343 P.2d 118, 123 (Cal.App.1959)]. Once a contractual relationship is established, either expressed or implied, then the physician has a duty to perform and can be held liable for any failure or shortcomings on his or her part.

2 Public Duty Scenario Hospitals

Health care organizations now function under a series of statutory and court created laws that effectively prohibit the arbitrary refusal to admit and treat patients. A Delaware case applied common law to this question and found that a hospital has a duty to act reasonably in its patient selection decisions. The historical custom of hospitals to maintain open emergency rooms has influenced the development of case law. The courts have therefore build upon the concept of negligent termination of gratuitous services and maintain that hospitals should be responsible in cases of “unmistakable emergency” to stabilize patients prior to transferring them to another facility. [Wilmington General Hospital v. Manlove, 174 A.2d 135 (Del.1961). This case had its greatest impact on the duty to treat indigent emergency patients and little effect on the duty to treat insured patients. In a later case, [Payton v. Weaver, 182 Cal.Rptr. 225, 131 Cal.App.3d 38 (Cal.App.1d 1982)] the court suggested that where even private hospitals had a “quasi public” character, paying patients had a right of access and treatment. This was stated because hospitals have a unique and sometimes scarce service, that they receive funding from public sources, and have a tendency to enjoy monopoly status in a community. Further, federal regulations require hospitals that enjoy a tax-exempt status or received construction grants under the Hill-Burton Act to treat all community patients. Institutions that receive Medicare and Medicaid funding are prohibited from discrimination.

3 Teacher Question

PLEASE RESPOND 2 sentences TO THE FOLLOWING:

Discuss a situation where you received some critical feedback. What type of feedback was it- formative or summative? Was it effective, or should it have been done in another way. As a manager, should you tailor your feedback style to each individual employee? Why? Why not? This is your Overview information in file (Constructive Feeback)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Consider the characteristics with which he begins, the traits he gains and the lessons he learns. Be sure to cite examples from the text with page numbers

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Require book ‘Introduction to Psychology’ by James W. Kalat

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Joel Bests, Damned Lies and Statistics: Untangling Numbers from the Media, Politicians, and Activists

Critical review should touch on the items noted (following). Your task in writing this critique is to evaluate fairly, yet be discerning. Your evaluation is the core of the critique. Formulate a thesis that states your evaluation position and develop that throughout the review. The critique will be evaluated based on the following:

Full citation and introduction
Thesis statement (yours!) and how it will be supported.
Body of the critique (item bullets below), including statements of how this work is related to a social research methods course.
Conclusion (yours!) that reminds reader of your critique position

First, consider biographical and professional information about the author:
Is the author living?
What other works has the author written?
What are the author’s qualifications and biases on this topic?
Is the author affiliated with any organization that might espouse a particular point of view?
Is the author affiliated with a college, university, government agency, political group, and/or industry?

Second, identify the author’s main ideas and points:
What is the thesis?
What are the main points and how well are they made?
What assumptions underlie the author’s argument(s)?
Has the author overlooked important points, or failed to consider important evidence?
Are the author’s conclusions valid?
Is there any additional subject or point that you wish the author had addressed?

Third, comment on stylistic components of the work:
Regarding clarity, organization and language, how well is the work written?
Do stylistic or rhetorical features affect the source’s content?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Write a persuasive, formal letter to a specific European philosopher. In the letter, argue that this philosopher is incorrect in his or her view about a particular issue.
Provide support from your readings, examples from your experience, and your own analysis to prove the philosopher wrong.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]