Category: Essays

This is an exam essay about: Explaining the Holocaust. For many years, historians have tended to agree with Walter Laquer when he wrote that “It is easy to claim that everyone should have known what would happen once Fascism came to power. But such an approach is ahistorical. There was no precedent in recent European history for the murderous character of German National Socialism and for this reason most contemporaries were caught unprepared”. However, this view has been challenged strongly, most recently by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen in his best-selling book, Hitler’s Willing Executioners. He has written that “not economic hardship, not the coercive means of a totalitarian state, not social psychological pressure, not invariable psychological propensities, but ideas about Jews that were pervasive in Germany and had been for decades induced ordinary Germans to kill systematically and without pity”. In other words, Laquer is arguing that even Germans who supported the Nazis were not expecting what the reality of the Holocaust turned out to be; Goldhagen, on the other hand, is arguing that Nazism simply permitted deep seated ideas and beliefs to be acted on, and that all Germans became (as his title suggests) willing participants in the Holocaust.

I will provide you with the rubric. Please follow up the Rubric for writing this essay. Thank you

Explaining the Holocaust. For many years, historians have tended to agree with Walter Laquer when he wrote that �?œIt is easy to claim that everyone should have known what would happen once Fascism came to power. But such an approach is ahistorical. There was no precedent in recent European history for the murderous character of German National Socialism and for this reason most contemporaries were caught unprepared�?. However, this view has been challenged strongly, most recently by Daniel Jonah Goldhagen in his best-selling book, Hitler�??s Willing Executioners. He has written that �?œnot economic hardship, not the coercive means of a totalitarian state, not social psychological pressure, not invariable psychological propensities, but ideas about Jews that were pervasive in Germany and had been for decades induced ordinary Germans to kill systematically and without pity�?. In other words, Laquer is arguing that even Germans who supported the Nazis were not expecting what the reality of the Holocaust turned out to be; Goldhagen, on the other hand, is arguing that Nazism simply permitted deep seated ideas and beliefs to be acted on, and that all Germans became (as his title suggests) willing participants in the Holocaust.
Which of these arguments is closer to the historical reality as you understand it? Was the Holocaust something that no one could have foreseen (except perhaps for Hitler�??s inner circle), or was it just the natural conclusion to tendencies present in German history long before Hitler arrived on the scene? Whichever approach you take, provide at least six specific historical examples to support your thesis.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

My recommandation for book(hardcopy resource): 1. stolen continents-the americas through indian eyes since 1492 by Ronald Wright 2. 1491 by Charles C. Mann 3. south and meso-american native spirituality edited by gary H. Gossen 4. Born to die- disease and new world conquest, 1492-1650 by Noble David Cook.5. the spanish struggle for justice int eh conquest of america by Lewis Hanke 6. the great encounter-native peoples and european settlers in the americas, 1492-1800 by Jayme A. Sokolow

my recommendation for electronic resources:
1. History without evidence: latin american inequality since 1491 by jeffrey G. Williamson address: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14766
2.reconstructing native american population history by Reich D.
3. Sepulveda, las casas, and the other:exploring the tension between moral universalism and alterity by Daniel R. Brunstetter
4political studies: 2011 vol 59, 733-752 just war against barbarians: revisiting the valladolid debates between sepulveda and las casas. by daniel r. brunstetter and dana zartner

There is no specific topic about the paper. All I need to do is to answer following questions:
1) what were the largest political entities in the new world in 1491?
2) what was their political organization?
3) what were their religious institutions?
4) how did the conquistadors and their supporters use native religious practice to justify their conquest?
5) what was the population of the new world in 1600 (my suggestion for this question: address the impact of european(disease, war, etc…))

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

You are expected to attend and participate in all of your tutorials throughout semester. This will facilitate your learning and better prepare you for the final exam and for your future academic studies. Each non-presenting student must come prepared to each tutorial when there is a case study presentation, with a Question (and your suggested Answer to that question) based on your reading of at least one peer-reviewed academic article. This academic articles must be related to the chapter topic that the case study is from (for example, if the case study is at the end of the chapter on Economics, then you must research and read an academic article relating to an international economic issue and develop a question and answer based on your reading of that article). You must relate your academic article, question and answer to marketing (i.e. what is the influence of economics on marketing factors such as market entry, the marketing mix, etc.) Your question must not be based on the questions at the end of the case study. You must hand a hard typed copy of your Question and Answer, along with a print-out of the first page of your academic article, to your tutor at the end of each tutorial where there is a case study presentation. Please note that, under NO circumstances will late Question and Answer sheets be accepted outside of the tutorial time – no exceptions. No Q&A (including a copy of the first page of the academic article) within the tutorial = No mark. Q & A not typed = no mark (handwritten Q&As will NOT be marked). Q&As will not be accepted through email. Please note that the Q&A is an individual effort.

You must include a hard copy of the first page of each of your academic articles (this should show the Abstract, author name(s), date (year), article title, journal name, no. issue and page no’s) with your Q&As. Each student must submit 5 x Q&As during semester.

Marks for the weekly Q&As will be awarded based on the following:
1 academic article = a maximum of 2 marks
2 academic articles = a maximum of 2.5 marks
3 or more academic articles = a maximum of 3 marks

If the quality of the Q&As is poor, at least 0.5 marks will be deduced from the above. For students who provide screen shots rather than the first page, half the marks will be deducted. For those who have a Q & A without any academic articles (based solely on the textbook and/or websites) you will receive a maximum mark of 0.5 (simply to differentiate your effort from those who don’t submit a Q & A at all). It is not enough just to have obtained academic articles – you must provide evidence of analysis and application to the question and the theory underlying the case study

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

*Description: The Australian government recently released sea level rise maps through the OzCoasts
website1
. These maps present sea level rise predictions for three scenarios that correspond with
projections made by the IPCC. These scenarios include: a 0.5 m rise by 2100; a 0.8 m rise by
2100; and a 1.1 m rise by 2100. For this exercise you are required to download and examine
eight sea level rise maps. These maps should come from two locations—Melbourne and southeast Queensland. Pick two sites within each of these locations and for each site copy both the low
and high scenario maps. This will give a total of eight maps (two sites each in Melbourne and
south-east Queensland and two maps for each site).

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Analysis the department of parliamentary service

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Provide challenging and thoughtful questions – try to include some of the key terms from epidemiology and sociology (morbidity, mortality, social class, capitalism, social capital, society, surveillance and monitoring, patriarchal attitudes etc
Make links between the lecture and tutorial readings
Stimulate discussion
Make theoretical connections and identify (if you can, what sort of theoretical perspectives the readings are coming from and what criticisms could be made of these)

How has the issue been portrayed in the media?
Provide additional information not in the study guide/lecture/readings
Raise further questions
Student presenters should each hand up their individual presentation notes to the tutor at the end of their session. These notes should clarify the issues identified in the marking guide for presentations. Presenters are advised to read this guide carefully and act on it in order to obtain the best mark for their presentation.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The task is to write an essay on “Bullying in the Workplace” …”what is bullying in the workplace? What are the possible effects of bullying ?What are the rights and responsibilities of the employer and employees. Please write an essay including introduction, body and conclusion. Also please use the above sub heading to make it read easier. Try to apply the essay to a healthcare environment
Essay should be written in the third person
Essay structure should include:
Introduction
• Topic sentences e.g. Work Health and safety Act, a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU), workplace bullying
• Statement of intent i.e. aim and structure of your paper e.g. This paper will review the literature on bullying in the workplace: what is bullying, what are the possible effects of bullying and what are the rights and responsibilities of the employer and employees.
Body
Use headings to structure your paper e.g.
• Heading – Workplace bullying. Subheadings – definition, features, common categories
• Heading – Effects of bullying. Subheadings – impact on the worker, impact on the organisation
• Heading – Rights and responsibilities. Subheadings – employer, employees.
• Heading – Process(s) in response to bullying
• Heading – Analysis of incident

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Choose what you think are two of the most important issues at each level, and compare and contrast the topics across the levels of sport. The topics could include such problems as gender equity, financial inequality, abuse of power, funding sources, amateurism, labor disputes and ethical issues. Using the selections and case studies as examples, in addition to research from at least four to five outside sources, describe what concerns organizations are facing at each level. Are the issues unique to one level versus another? What similarities are there in the issues that each level faces? What conclusions can be drawn about the business of sports, based on this analysis? Predict what the future of the business of sports will look like, given the analysis. Organize all of the ideas into an eight to ten page research paper (not including title and reference pages), formatted in APA style.

Writing the Final Paper

The Final Paper:
•Must be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length and formatted according to APA style.
•Must include a cover page that includes:
– Title of paper
– Student’s name
– Course name and number
– Instructor’s name
– Date submitted
•Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
•Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
•Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
•Must use at least four scholarly resources.
•Must document all sources in APA style.
•Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

within the context of a case study discuss the pharmacotherapeutics of any two prescibed medications .Clearly identify in introduction what asignment is about and why you have choosen this approach ,briefly identify the relationship of the medication to the patients condition in the introduction .In the body of the assignment , which should be 80-90% of word count you need to focus on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the 2 drugs While it is important that you provide supporting evidence for what you are saying this is not the same as cutting and pasting from literature sources even though you acknowledge that source .it is much better to describe ,explain,discuss in your own words which you then can support with evidence based sources do not use words or phrases that you do not understand or cant explain in your own words .within case study context keep referring back to patient where relevant conclusion needs to sum up main points in body of assignment .I work as a macmillan nurse and would like to use metoclopramide 10mg tid and co-danthramer as my 2 drugs .the patient has nausea and constipation with a history of gastric cancer.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

1. Explain at least three of the foundational ethical principles (e.g. The Golden Mean, an Ethic of Care, etc.) that the book reviews.
2. Explain the Potter Box for ethical reasoning and how it can be used to analyze an ethical dilemma in communication.
3. Apply the Potter Box to any of the cases reviewed in the book. You may focus on one case or several cases in your discussion. You may use any of the cases from the book. They can be from the same unit (e.g. PR, News, etc.) or from a variety.
4. Explain why you made the choices you did when deciding on a response to the dilemma in the case study, whether you feel you could defend your choices in public, and why.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]