ASHFORD SOC 120 Entire Course Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility

Relativism. Give an example of something that one culture might regard as a virtue that another culture might not. Explain why this could lead to relativism.

Egoism and Altruism. Psychological egoism claims that whatever we do, we do out of self-interest. Give an example of an act you think is not done out of self-interest, and explain how the psychological egoist might try to interpret that act as selfish.

School Prayer. John wants prayer in school, and Mary does not. Describe a compromise position you think John and Mary might agree on, and identify any problems that position might encounter.

Responsibility and Reward. You work hard in your office; overtime, weekends, and early mornings. You get paid well, but you realize your coworkers get paid the same as you do, though they do not put in the effort you do. Some have even been promoted ahead of you. Identify which of the responses below is the best one to adopt:

a. Continue to work hard and hope it is recognized

b. Begin slacking off

c. Roll your eyes at the other employees and make them feel guilty

d. Look for another job

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.

 

Relativism and Morality. In “Some Moral Minima,” Lenn Goodman argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. Do you think Goodman is right? Using specific examples, explore the challenges Goodman presents to relativism. Determine whether you think there are such universal moral requirements, and defend your answer in a well-argued three page paper.

Death Penalty. Advocates of the death penalty recognize that no system is perfect and that applying the death penalty runs a small risk of executing someone who is innocent. Is this a price society should be willing to pay?

Future Generations and Development. Answer one (1) of the questions below. Be sure to explain your answer.

a. Assume that by burning coal extensively, the U. S. causes a substantial increase in pollution and acid rain, and Canada, understandably, objects. How might the U. S. and Canada resolve this dispute?

b. How can underdeveloped societies grow economically and develop technologically without causing environmental harm to their own country as well as to other countries?

c. Can countries such as the United States continue to grow and develop without causing environmental damage? How can one balance the demands of economic development with environmental concerns?

Rough Draft of Final Paper on Ethics: Theory and Practices. In this course, we look at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. We also look at the different kinds of perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism.

For this paper, you will pick an ethical issue to discuss, but one that is not a specific topic addressed in our text (thus, gun control or product liability would not be possible choices). Some examples are given below, but it is recommended that you choose to write on a topic you have already encountered or you have thought about previously. (One way of thinking about this is to think of an ethical issue that either worries you or enrages you.) Identify, specifically, the ethical issue and the ethical problems it presents. Drawing on various sources, explain how one of the classical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) would resolve the problem. Then, contrast this response with the perspective brought to the issue by relativism, emotivism, or ethical egoism. Finally, state which of these views is closer to your own, supporting your response with a clearly-presented and well-supported argument. The more specific you can be the better, and feel free to include examples that will strengthen your account.

Possible Topics

§ Physician Assisted Suicide

§ Corporate Contributions to Political Campaigns

§ Ethical Treatment of Prisoners

§ The Media and Its Responsibilities

§ Gay Marriage

§ Health Care: Right or Privilege

§ Ethical Treatment of Animals

§ Legalizing Marijuana

§ Ethical Problems of Gambling

§ Progressive Taxation Rates

§ Following Military Orders That May Be Unethical

§ Age Restrictions on Alcohol Relative to Military Eligibility

Presumption of Innocence. In discussions about personal privacy and government surveillance, one sometimes hears “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you don’t have anything to worry about.” What is your reaction to this claim? Give two examples of some things that may not be “wrong” but you do not necessarily want to be public knowledge.

Workplace Surveillance. Imagine your boss has decided that all phone calls, e-mails, and other communications will be recorded and monitored. What assumptions is the boss making about the employees? Is such monitoring justified morally? Is it a good idea as a management tool?

“Victimless” Crime. Can the government require you to a wear seat belt while driving? What is the argument that it can, and what is the argument that it cannot? How would such seat belt laws differ from the requirement that infants in cars be in car seats?

Ethical Progress. The outlawing of slavery and extending voting rights to women seem to indicate that ethics can have beneficial results. Give an example from the past that indicates a similar result or a current social policy that might be regarded as wrong, which therefore needs to be changed. Give your reasons and indicate which ethical theory you believe provides the best support for your view.

Focus of the Final Paper

In this course, we look at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. We also look at the different kinds of perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism.

For this paper, you will pick an ethical issue to discuss, but one that is not a specific topic addressed in our text (thus, gun control or product liability would not be possible choices). Some examples are given below, but it is recommended that you choose to write on a topic you have already encountered or you have thought about previously. (One way of thinking about this is to think of an ethical issue that either worries you or enrages you.)

Identify, specifically, the ethical issue and the ethical problems it presents. Drawing on various sources, explain how one of the classical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) would resolve the problem. Then, contrast this response with the perspective brought to the issue by relativism, emotivism, or ethical egoism. Finally, state which of these views is closer to your own, supporting your response with a clearly-presented and well-supported argument. The more specific you can be the better, and feel free to include examples that will strengthen your account.

Possible Topics

§ Physician Assisted Suicide

§ Corporate Contributions to Political Campaigns

§ Ethical Treatment of Prisoners

§ The Media and Its Responsibilities

§ Gay Marriage

§ Health Care: Right or Privilege

§ Ethical Treatment of Animals

§ Legalizing Marijuana

§ Ethical Problems of Gambling

§ Progressive Taxation Rates

§ Following Military Orders That May Be Unethical

§ Age Restrictions on Alcohol Relative to Military Eligibility

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

ASHFORD SOC 120 Week 5 DQ 2 Ethical Progress

Ethical Progress. The outlawing of slavery and extending voting rights to women seem to indicate that ethics can have beneficial results. Give an example from the past that indicates a similar result or a current social policy that might be regarded as wrong, which therefore needs to be changed. Give your reasons and indicate which ethical theory you believe provides the best support for your view.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

ASHFORD SOC 120 Week 5 DQ 1 Victimless Crimes

“Victimless” Crime. Can the government require you to a wear seat belt while driving? What is the argument that it can, and what is the argument that it cannot? How would such seat belt laws differ from the requirement that infants in cars be in car seats?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

ASHFORD SOC 120 Week 4 DQ 2 Workplace Surveillance

Workplace Surveillance. Imagine your boss has decided that all phone calls, e-mails, and other communications will be recorded and monitored. What assumptions is the boss making about the employees? Is such monitoring justified morally? Is it a good idea as a management tool?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

ASHFORD SOC 120 Week 4 DQ 1 Presumption of Innocence

Presumption of Innocence. In discussions about personal privacy and government surveillance, one sometimes hears “If you’re not doing anything wrong, you don’t have anything to worry about.” What is your reaction to this claim? Give two examples of some things that may not be “wrong” but you do not necessarily want to be public knowledge.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

ASHFORD SOC 120 Week 3 Rough Draft of Final Paper on Ethics Theory

Rough Draft of Final Paper on Ethics: Theory and Practices. In this course, we look at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. We also look at the different kinds of perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism.

For this paper, you will pick an ethical issue to discuss, but one that is not a specific topic addressed in our text (thus, gun control or product liability would not be possible choices). Some examples are given below, but it is recommended that you choose to write on a topic you have already encountered or you have thought about previously. (One way of thinking about this is to think of an ethical issue that either worries you or enrages you.) Identify, specifically, the ethical issue and the ethical problems it presents. Drawing on various sources, explain how one of the classical theories (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) would resolve the problem. Then, contrast this response with the perspective brought to the issue by relativism, emotivism, or ethical egoism. Finally, state which of these views is closer to your own, supporting your response with a clearly-presented and well-supported argument. The more specific you can be the better, and feel free to include examples that will strengthen your account.

Possible Topics

§ Physician Assisted Suicide

§ Corporate Contributions to Political Campaigns

§ Ethical Treatment of Prisoners

§ The Media and Its Responsibilities

§ Gay Marriage

§ Health Care: Right or Privilege

§ Ethical Treatment of Animals

§ Legalizing Marijuana

§ Ethical Problems of Gambling

§ Progressive Taxation Rates

§ Following Military Orders That May Be Unethical

§ Age Restrictions on Alcohol Relative to Military Eligibility

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The book “triumph of the spirit” by Angel M. Ramos, Ph.D.

Pick one of these to write about:

Explain why there was apathy among the Gallaudet students prior to the DPN protest.
Explain why the Gallaudet students opposed the Gallaudet Board of Trustee’s (BOT) selection for president.
Explain why the BOT was surprised about the scope of the DPN protest.
Identify, describe and give an example of a Partner, Ignorant, and Plantationist/Audist.
Explain how Ignorants become Partners using Dr. Zinser as an example.
Explain why Dr. Zinser was surprised when the students and Deaf community revolted against her appointment and what convinced Dr. Zinser to resign as Gallaudet president.
Identify the individual who said “Deaf people are not ready to function in a hearing world” and who she blamed for being misquoted and why that individual was not able to defend herself.
Explain why it is necessary for hearing and Deaf people to work together.
Explain why the DPN protest was not a protest against hearing people.
Explain why some people believe that the DPN movement was a civ

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

essay about myself in third person

In no more than 800 words (but you can write much less if it gets the job done), write about your life using the first line: “Once upon a time…”
· Your short-short story about yourself MUST be
written in third-person (that means you refer to
yourself as “she” or “he”).
You must TRY to employ all the five elements of
fiction: plot, theme, characterization, point of
view, and setting.
· Use sensory details—sight, sound, touch, taste,
smell! This makes descriptions interesting!
Fill in the five elements (with one to four
sentences) listed below with your:
· Characterization of yourself (both your name and
your physical, emotional, intellectual traits)
· The plot of your story. How would you introduce
your story? What would be some conflicts; what
would be the climax of your story? Would there
be a resolution (yet)?
· Setting of your story (time AND place).
· Point of view of your story. Here you know the
answer: it must be third-person.
. Is there a theme, a moral, to your story? Is
there some overarching philosophy you would want
to convey? Is there any recurring motif or
symbol that might help underscore the greater
meaning to your life?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

PHL 251 Week 4 Individual Applying Problem Solving

Resources: Ch. 10–12 of the text, personal experiences

Choose two different real-world problems you have encountered. The problems should be chosen with the intention of applying persuasive thinking as a solution to one and scientific thinking as a solution to the other.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you provide the following:

·  A description of each of the problem situations

·  An explanation of using persuasive thinking to solve the first problem

·  An explanation of using scientific thinking to solve the second problem

Summarize the solutions to each problem with a description of how the solution will solve the problem.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

PHL 251 Week 4 Learning Team Evaluate Creative Thinking

Resources: Individual assignments from Week Two and Ch. 13 of Thinking

Write a 350-word paper in which you evaluate your team member’s metaphors according to the criteria listed below.

·  Refer to the questions in Ch. 13: “Testing Against our Thinking Bases,” in order to understand these terms and complete this assignment.

o  Perception

o  Personal Barriers

o  Language

o  Feelings

o  Creative Thinking

Summarize the team’s summaries and compile them into one cohesive paper.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]