I WANT A PREVIEW OF THE FIRST PAGE PLEASE!
Casino Gambling in Springfield MA
For or against?
Explain, analyze, and research.
I will be uploading source papers/articles that I must use.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Write a one-page statement describing an experience in the workplace when you felt discrimination.
Examples of possible sources for feeling discrimination are:
Disability
Age
Passed over for promotions
Given a demeaning job
No raise
Language
Sexual orientation
Beliefs
Ethnicity
Excluded due to personal characteristics
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]For your first essay, meditate upon an object or thing that we often take for granted: a key, a camera, a coat, a cocker-spaniel, a kite, for example. (It doesn’t have to be alliterative with “key”.) We are experimenting here with both content (what you are writing about), but also form…how it looks on paper. Feel free to try some of the techniques or styles in the first three essays we have read (“JoyasVoladoras,” “Short Talks,” and “Voices”). Also feel free to write straight up if you prefer.
• Explore it as an object first, its appearance, size, shape, texture, composition, symmetry or asymmetry, etc. Do this with “cubist” attention, in other words, from every angle, from near and far away, intensely close-up or from a great height.
• Then explore it as a function, that is what it does or can do, what it doesn’t or can’t do, what it’s used for (if anything) in all of its possibilities, how its use or function affect its design (and/or vice versa), the history of its use (if relevant) and future of its usefulness (speculate!).
• Finally, meditate upon its meaning or connection to humankind, beyond its function. How does it help define us as thinking, breathing creatures? How does its presence enhance our lives? How would its absence rob us of something? How did it become something that we could afford to take for granted? Where would we be without it?
Examples:
If I were writing about a key in terms of its appearance, I might focus not on any individual key but rather on the multiplicity of keys: skeleton key, key-to-the-city, house key, car key (and key-less cars), those plastic hotel keys, piano keys, key idea, the key to one’s heart. How far I would go in physically describing those would depend on what seemed most interesting to me. What would be boring would be to describe each one or to walk through a bunch of keys on a key ring and describe them in the same way.
If I were looking at the functionality of a kite I would go to youtube and type in the words “Washington Kite Festival” and watch what people can do with them, what possibilities are out there for giant, beautiful kites. I would explore weather kites and balloons, revisit Ben Franklin and his (maybe fictional) story of discovery of electricity. I would try to find out something (from reputable sources, not WIKI) about the history, social and otherwise, of kite-making, flying, etc. I might end with a meditation on whether or not the kite has a future. (Parents used to take their kids to the park every breezy day and fly kites. When I was about five our yard backed up against a wide open field behind an elementary school, and every evening if the weather was nice parents and kids were there by the dozens, flying kites. I haven’t seen a kite for years…where did they go?)
Finally, if I were meditating on the cocker-spaniel and its meaning and connection to humankind, I would have to talk about the simple joy of being, how the connections between “man and beast” suggest that all life depends on other life, that we need echoes of ourselves to make sense of ourselves but also to remind us of our responsibilities to ourselves and our fellow creatures and our planet. How possible it is to communicate with another form of life! How the joy of caring for another makes our tedious, stressful lives worth living! How happiness is not just a human emotion!
Here’s a meditation on water from James Joyce’s Ulysses:
(Leopold Bloom, one of the novel’s two main characters, returns home late one night and decides to make a pot of tea. As he runs water into the kettle and sets it on the range, he begins thinking about water)…
What else did Bloom, waterlover, drawer of water, wattercarrier, returning to the range, admire?
Its universality: its democratic equality and constancy to its nature in seeking its own level: its vastness in the ocean…its unplumbed profundity…the restlessness of its waves and surface particles visiting in turn all points of its seaboard: the independence of its units: the variability of states of sea…its climatic and commercial significance: its predominance of 3 to 1 over the dry land of the globe…its capacity to dissolve and hold in solution all soluble substances including millions of tons of the most precious metals: its slow erosions of peninsulas and islands…its weigh and volume and density; its imperturbability in lagoons and highland tarns: its gradations of colours in the torrid and temperate and frigid zones…its violence in seaquakes, waterspouts, Artesian wells, eruptions, torrents, eddies, freshets, spates, groundswells, watersheds, waterpartings, geysers, cataracts, whirlpools, maelstroms, inundations, deluges, cloudbursts…its secrecy in springs and latent humidity…saturation of air, distillation of dew: the simplicity of its composition, two constituent parts of hydrogen with one constituent part of oxygen: its healing virtues: its buoyancy in the waters of the Dead Sea: its persevering penetrativeness in runnels, gullies, inadequate dams, leaks on shipboard: its properties for cleansing, quenching thirst and fire, nourishing vegetation…its metamorphoses as vapour, mist, cloud, rain, sleet, snow, hail: its strength in rigid hydrants: its variety of forms in loughs and bays and gulfs and bights and guts and lagoons and atolls and archipelagoes and sounds and fjords minches and tidal estuaries and arms of sea: its solidity in glaciers, icebergs, icefloes: its docility in working hydraulic millwheels, trubines, dynamos, electrical power stations, bleachworks, tanneries, scutchmills: its utility in canals, rivers, if navigable, floating and graving docks: its potentiality derivable from harnessed tides or watercourses falling from level to level: its submarine fauna and flora…numerically, if not literally, the inhabitants of the globe: its ubiquity as constituting 90% of the human body: the noxiousness of its effluvia in lacustrine marshes, pestilential fens, faded flowerwater, stagnant pools in the waning moon.
Joyce, James. Ulysses. (The Corrected Text, Hans Walter Gubler, ed.). New York: Vintage Books, 1986 (original text 1922).
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Request 4-6 page paper on the topic of leadership.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Paper needs to include the 11 Program Outcomes
1) Critical Thinking
2) Quantative Reasoning
3) Information Literacy
4) Communication
5) Scientific literacy
6) Cultural Literacy
7) Life Long personal growth
8) Aeronautical Science
9) Aviation Legislation
10) Aviation Safety
11) Aviation Management and Operations
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]i’m planning to write a research about mobile phone and i want a brain storm about it as a tree. also, i want to include 2 to 3 sources added in the brain storm.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Describe and compare the management frameworks developed by Henri Fayol and Henry Mintzberg.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]December 2, 1823
The Monroe Doctrine was expressed during President Monroe’s seventh annual message to Congress,
December 2, 1823:
…At the proposal of the Russian Imperial Government, made through the minister of the Emperor
residing here, a full power and instructions have been transmitted to the minister of the United States at
St. Petersburg to arrange by amicable negotiation the respective rights and interests of the two nations
on the northwest coast of this continent. A similar proposal has been made by His Imperial Majesty to
the Government of Great Britain, which as likewise been acceded to. The Government of the United
States has been desirous by this friendly proceeding of manifesting the great value which they have
invariably attached to the friendship of the Emperor and their solicitude to cultivate the best
understanding with his Government. In this discussions to which this interest has given rise and in the
arrangements by which they may terminate the occasion has been judged proper for asserting, as a
principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American
continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are
henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers…
It was stated at the commencement of the last session that a great effort was then making in Spain and
Portugal to improve the condition of the people of those countries, and that it appeared to be
conducted with extraordinary moderation. It need scarcely be remarked that the results have been so
far very different from what was then anticipated. Of events in that quarter of the globe, with which we
have so much intercourse and from which we derive our origin, we have always been anxious and
interested spectators. The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of
the liberty and happiness of their fellow-men on that side of the Atlantic. In the wars of the European
powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our
policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or
make preparation for our defense. With the movements in this hemisphere we are of necessity more
immediately connected, and by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial
observers. The political system of the allied powers is essentially different in this respect form that of
America. This difference proceeds from that which exists in their respective Governments; and to the
defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured
by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled
felicity, this whole nation is devoted. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations
existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on
their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and
safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and
shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintain it,
and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we
could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner
their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly
disposition toward the United States. In the war between those new Governments and Spain we declared our neutrality at the time of their recognition, and to this we have adhered, and shall continue to adhere, provided no change shall occur which, in the judgement of the competent authorities of this Government, shall make a corresponding change on the part of the United States indispensable to their security.
The late events in Spain and Portugal shew that Europe is still unsettled. Of this important fact no stronger proof can be adduced than that the allied powers should have thought it proper, on any principle satisfactory to themselves, to have interposed by force in the internal concerns of Spain. To what extent such interposition may be carried, on the same principle, is a question in which all independent powers whose governments differ from theirs are interested, even those most remote, and surely none of them more so than the United States. Our policy in regard to Europe, which was adopted at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter of the globe, nevertheless remains the same, which is, not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers; to consider the government de facto as the legitimate government for us; to cultivate friendly relations with it, and to preserve those relations by a frank, firm, and manly policy, meeting in all instances the just claims of every power, submitting to injuries from none. But in regard to those continents circumstances are eminently and conspicuously different.
It is impossible that the allied powers should extend their political system to any portion of either continent without endangering our peace and happiness; nor can anyone believe that our southern brethren, if left to themselves, would adopt it of their own accord. It is equally impossible, therefore, that we should behold such interposition in any form with indifference. If we look to the comparative strength and resources of Spain and those new Governments, and their distance from each other, it must be obvious that she can never subdue them. It is still the true policy of the United States to leave the parties to themselves, in hope that other powers will pursue the same course…
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]How do these documents reflect changing views on America’s role in the world? How do these documents reflect changing views on American Society? These documents span over 25 years – was there any change over time reflected in our perspectives and foreign policies? And finally, how are the documents similar to and/or different from our modern understanding of America and our role in the world? Use these questions as a guide for writing your response to the documents!
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This is for dual enrollment government.
It is argued in your textbook that in the twentieth century, and particularly since the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt, Congress has ceded to the president a major role in the legislative process. Given what you have learned about the formation of our national constitution, and the history of the Congress and the Presidency, how do you feel the framers would view this shift in legislative initiative? How do you believe the framers would respond to the increase in Presidential power overall? What are the pros and cons?
Things you might wish to consider in your paper:
1. Readings from your text
2. Federalist 69 (link: )
(you’ll have to page down)
3. Alexis de Tocqueville: Democracy in America, “Legislative Powers of the Federal Government” (link: )
Remember, this is not solely an opinion paper. It is an INFORMED opinion paper. In order for you to present an opinion you must be able to back it up with facts.
Paper requirements:
1) Minimum of full three to five double spaced pages, with normal margins top and bottom, left and right
2) no larger than 12 point, standard type
3) MLA or equivalent format
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]